| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYEXKQ-J8EQtTiYci1wdrRG7SPpuGhejJFY0cc5QQovEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 16:45:25 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 10:50 AM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 08:55:04AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 8:49 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > We have two options:
> > > > 1. Treat all BPF_LSM_CGROUP the same, regardless of attach_btf_id
> > > > 2. Treat BPF_LSM_CGROUP+attach_btf_id as a separate hook point
> > > >
> > > > I was doing (2) in the original patch, but switching to (1) here:
> > > >
> > > > * bpf_prog_query returns all attached BPF_LSM_CGROUP programs
> > > > regardless of attach_btf_id
> > > > * attach_btf_id is exported via bpf_prog_info
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 ++
> > > > kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > > kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 +-
> > > > 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > > > index b9d2d6de63a7..432fc5f49567 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > > > @@ -1432,6 +1432,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
> > > > __u32 attach_flags;
> > > > __aligned_u64 prog_ids;
> > > > __u32 prog_cnt;
> > > > + __aligned_u64 prog_attach_flags; /* output: per-program attach_flags */
> > > > } query;
> > > >
> > > > struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */
> > > > @@ -5911,6 +5912,10 @@ struct bpf_prog_info {
> > > > __u64 run_cnt;
> > > > __u64 recursion_misses;
> > > > __u32 verified_insns;
> > > > + /* BTF ID of the function to attach to within BTF object identified
> > > > + * by btf_id.
> > > > + */
> > > > + __u32 attach_btf_func_id;
> > > > } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > > >
> > > > struct bpf_map_info {
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > > index a959cdd22870..08a1015ee09e 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > > @@ -1074,6 +1074,7 @@ static int cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > > > static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> > > > {
> > > > + __u32 __user *prog_attach_flags = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_attach_flags);
> > > > __u32 __user *prog_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
> > > > enum bpf_attach_type type = attr->query.attach_type;
> > > > enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype;
> > > > @@ -1081,50 +1082,92 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > struct hlist_head *progs;
> > > > struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > > > int cnt, ret = 0, i;
> > > > + int total_cnt = 0;
> > > > u32 flags;
> > > >
> > > > - atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
> > > > - if (atype < 0)
> > > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > > + enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type from_atype, to_atype;
> > > >
> > > > - progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > > - flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > > > + if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) {
> > > > + from_atype = CGROUP_LSM_START;
> > > > + to_atype = CGROUP_LSM_END;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + from_atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
> > > > + if (from_atype < 0)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + to_atype = from_atype;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > - effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > > - lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > > > + for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
> > > > + progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > > + flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > > >
> > > > - if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > > - cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > > - else
> > > > - cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
> > > > + effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > > >
> > > > - if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > > - return -EFAULT;
> > > > - if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt, sizeof(cnt)))
> > > > + if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > > + total_cnt += bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > > + else
> > > > + total_cnt += prog_list_length(progs);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (type != BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &total_cnt, sizeof(total_cnt)))
> > > > return -EFAULT;
> > > > - if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !cnt)
> > > > + if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !total_cnt)
> > > > /* return early if user requested only program count + flags */
> > > > return 0;
> > > > - if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt) {
> > > > - cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (attr->query.prog_cnt < total_cnt) {
> > > > + total_cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
> > > > ret = -ENOSPC;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
> > > > - return bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > - struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> > > > - u32 id;
> > > > + for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
> > > > + if (total_cnt <= 0)
> > > > + break;
> > > >
> > > > - i = 0;
> > > > - hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
> > > > - prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
> > > > - id = prog->aux->id;
> > > > - if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> > > > - return -EFAULT;
> > > > - if (++i == cnt)
> > > > - break;
> > > > + progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > > + flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > > > +
> > > > + effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > > + lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > > > +
> > > > + if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > > + cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > > + else
> > > > + cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (cnt >= total_cnt)
> > > > + cnt = total_cnt;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
> > > > + ret = bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> > > > + u32 id;
> > > > +
> > > > + i = 0;
> > > > + hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
> > > > + prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
> > > > + id = prog->aux->id;
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> > > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > > + if (++i == cnt)
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > > +
> > > > + if (prog_attach_flags)
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> > > > + if (copy_to_user(prog_attach_flags + i, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > + prog_ids += cnt;
> > > > + total_cnt -= cnt;
> > > > + if (prog_attach_flags)
> > > > + prog_attach_flags += cnt;
> > > > }
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > index 5ed2093e51cc..4137583c04a2 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > @@ -3520,7 +3520,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_cnt
> > > > +#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_attach_flags
> > > >
> > > > static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> > > > @@ -3556,6 +3556,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > > > case BPF_CGROUP_SYSCTL:
> > > > case BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT:
> > > > case BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT:
> > > > + case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
> > > > return cgroup_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > > > case BPF_LIRC_MODE2:
> > > > return lirc_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > > > @@ -4066,6 +4067,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
> > > >
> > > > if (prog->aux->btf)
> > > > info.btf_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->btf);
> > > > + info.attach_btf_func_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
> > > Note that exposing prog->aux->attach_btf_id only may not be enough
> > > unless it can assume info.attach_btf_id is always referring to btf_vmlinux
> > > for all bpf prog types.
> >
> > We also export btf_id two lines above, right? Btw, I left a comment in
> > the bpftool about those btf_ids, I'm not sure how resolve them and
> > always assume vmlinux for now.
> yeah, that btf_id above is the cgroup-lsm prog's btf_id which has its
> func info, line info...etc. It is not the one the attach_btf_id correspond
> to. attach_btf_id refers to either aux->attach_btf or aux->dst_prog's btf (or
> target btf id here).
>
> It needs a consensus on where this attach_btf_id, target btf id, and
> prog_attach_flags should be. If I read the patch 7 thread correctly,
> I think Andrii is suggesting to expose them to userspace through link, so
> potentially putting them in bpf_link_info. The bpf_prog_query will
> output a list of link ids. The same probably applies to
Yep and I think it makes sense because link is representing one
specific attachment (and I presume flags can be stored inside the link
itself as well, right?).
But if legacy non-link BPF_PROG_ATTACH is supported then using
bpf_link_info won't cover legacy prog-only attachments.
> the BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE query_flags but not sure about the prog_attach_flags
> in this case and probably the userspace can figure that out by using
> the cgroup_id in the link? That is all I can think of right now
> and don't have better idea :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists