[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220524075311.649153-1-wangyufen@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:53:11 +0800
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...nel.org>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <jakub@...udflare.com>,
<lmb@...udflare.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kafai@...com>,
<dsahern@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <songliubraving@...com>,
<yhs@...com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf,sockmap: fix sk->sk_forward_alloc warn_on in sk_stream_kill_queues
During TCP sockmap redirect pressure test, the following warning is triggered:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 2145 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xbc/0xd0
CPU: 3 PID: 2145 Comm: iperf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.10.0+ #9
Call Trace:
inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
inet_csk_listen_stop+0xbb/0x380
tcp_close+0x41b/0x480
inet_release+0x42/0x80
__sock_release+0x3d/0xa0
sock_close+0x11/0x20
__fput+0x9d/0x240
task_work_run+0x62/0x90
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x110/0x120
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The reason we observed is that:
When the listener is closing, a connection may have completed the three-way
handshake but not accepted, and the client has sent some packets. The child
sks in accept queue release by inet_child_forget()->inet_csk_destroy_sock(),
but psocks of child sks have not released.
To fix, add sock_map_destroy to release psocks.
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
include/linux/skmsg.h | 1 +
net/core/skmsg.c | 1 +
net/core/sock_map.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index cc4d5e394031..c4de82d5e72c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2092,6 +2092,7 @@ int sock_map_bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
union bpf_attr __user *uattr);
void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk);
+void sock_map_destroy(struct sock *sk);
void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
#else
static inline int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog,
diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index c5a2d6f50f25..153b6dec9b6a 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct sk_psock {
spinlock_t link_lock;
refcount_t refcnt;
void (*saved_unhash)(struct sock *sk);
+ void (*saved_destroy)(struct sock *sk);
void (*saved_close)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
void (*saved_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
void (*saved_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 22b983ade0e7..7e03f96e441b 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ struct sk_psock *sk_psock_init(struct sock *sk, int node)
psock->eval = __SK_NONE;
psock->sk_proto = prot;
psock->saved_unhash = prot->unhash;
+ psock->saved_destroy = prot->destroy;
psock->saved_close = prot->close;
psock->saved_write_space = sk->sk_write_space;
diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 81d4b4756a02..9f08ccfaf6da 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -1561,6 +1561,29 @@ void sock_map_unhash(struct sock *sk)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_unhash);
+void sock_map_destroy(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ void (*saved_destroy)(struct sock *sk);
+ struct sk_psock *psock;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
+ if (unlikely(!psock)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (sk->sk_prot->destroy)
+ sk->sk_prot->destroy(sk);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ saved_destroy = psock->saved_destroy;
+ sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ sk_psock_stop(psock, true);
+ sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
+ saved_destroy(sk);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_map_destroy);
+
void sock_map_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
{
void (*saved_close)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index be3947e70fec..38550bb1b90b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -540,6 +540,7 @@ static void tcp_bpf_rebuild_protos(struct proto prot[TCP_BPF_NUM_CFGS],
struct proto *base)
{
prot[TCP_BPF_BASE] = *base;
+ prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].destroy = sock_map_destroy;
prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].close = sock_map_close;
prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].recvmsg = tcp_bpf_recvmsg;
prot[TCP_BPF_BASE].sock_is_readable = sk_msg_is_readable;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists