[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220525152006.e87d3fa50aca58fdc1b43b6a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:06 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION
8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d
On Wed, 25 May 2022 23:07:35 +0100 Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@...c27.com> wrote:
> This is i386, so an unsigned long is 32-bit, but i_blocks is a blkcnt_t
> i.e. a u64, which makes the shift without a cast of the LHS fishy.
Ah, of course, thanks. I remember 32 bits ;)
--- a/mm/shmem.c~mm-shmemc-suppress-shift-warning
+++ a/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@ alloc_nohuge:
spin_lock_irq(&info->lock);
info->alloced += folio_nr_pages(folio);
- inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << folio_order(folio);
+ inode->i_blocks += (blkcnt_t)BLOCKS_PER_PAGE << folio_order(folio);
shmem_recalc_inode(inode);
spin_unlock_irq(&info->lock);
alloced = true;
_
Powered by blists - more mailing lists