netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 net] net: sched: fixed barrier to prevent skbuff sticking in qdisc backlog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <165362691353.5864.10388871011458588553.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 04:48:33 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, vray@...rayinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] net: sched: fixed barrier to prevent skbuff sticking
 in qdisc backlog

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:17:46 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Vincent Ray <vray@...rayinc.com>
> 
> In qdisc_run_begin(), smp_mb__before_atomic() used before test_bit()
> does not provide any ordering guarantee as test_bit() is not an atomic
> operation. This, added to the fact that the spin_trylock() call at
> the beginning of qdisc_run_begin() does not guarantee acquire
> semantics if it does not grab the lock, makes it possible for the
> following statement :
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3,net] net: sched: fixed barrier to prevent skbuff sticking in qdisc backlog
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/a54ce3703613

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html