[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220526204225.03b7804c@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 20:42:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ocelot: fix wrong time_after usage
On Mon, 23 May 2022 16:00:04 +0200 Clément Léger wrote:
> > If you're looking at me, I don't have the hardware to test, sorry.
> > Frame DMA is one of the components NXP removed when building their DSA
> > variants of these switches. But the function is called once or twice per
> > NAPI poll cycle, so it's worth optimizing as much as possible.
> >
> > Clement, could you please do some testing? The patch that Andrew is
> > talking about is 35da1dfd9484 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve performance
> > of busy bit polling").
>
> Ok, I'll have to wake up that ocelot board but I'll try to do that.
We can't hold it in PW for much longer, please repost once tested.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists