lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 12:18:29 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ss: Show zerocopy sendfile status of TLS
 sockets

On Mon, 30 May 2022 11:17:45 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Also please send a patch to Documentation/, I forgot about that.

Actually let me take care of that on my own, I have some optimizations
to add, saves me a rebase ;)

Does this sound good?


Optional optimizations
----------------------

There are certain condition-specific optimizations the TLS ULP can make,
if requested. Those optimizations are either not universally beneficial
or may impact correctness, hence they require an opt-in.
All options are set per-socket using setsockopt(), and their
state can be checked using getsockopt() and via socket diag (``ss``).

TLS_INFO_ZC_SENDFILE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For device offload only. Allow sendfile() data to be transmitted directly
to the NIC without making an in-kernel copy. This allows true zero-copy
behavior when device offload is enabled.

The application must make sure that the data is not modified between being
submitted and transmission completing. In other words this is mostly
applicable if the data sent on a socket via sendfile() is read-only.

Modifying the data may result in different versions of the data being used
for the original TCP transmission and TCP retransmissions. To the receiver
this will look like TLS records had been tampered with and will result
in record authentication failures.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ