netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ss: Show zerocopy sendfile status of TLS sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f549f350-5d29-88af-f551-08aab261ec38@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 10:00:25 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ss: Show zerocopy sendfile status of TLS
 sockets

On 2022-05-30 19:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2022 17:14:38 +0300
> Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com> wrote:
> 
>> +static void tcp_tls_zc_sendfile(struct rtattr *attr)
>> +{
>> +	out(" zerocopy_sendfile: %s", attr ? "active" : "inactive");
>> +}
> 
> I would prefer a shorter output just adding "zc_sendfile" if present and nothing
> if not present. That is how other optns like ecn, ecnseen, etc work.

I see David merged the patch as is to net-next, despite the comments. 
Should I still make the requested change? If yes, should I submit it as 
a v2 or as a next patch on top of this one?

> At some point ss needs conversion to json but that will take days of work.