[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ypfvs+VsNHWQKT6H@fractal.lan>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:01:07 -0700
From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [doc] msg_zerocopy.rst: clarify the TCP shutdown scenario
Hi Willem,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 09:24:32AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:48 PM Frederik Deweerdt
> <frederik.deweerdt@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Based on my understanding, retransmissions of zero copied buffers can
> > happen after `close(2)`, the patch below amends the docs to suggest how
> > notifications should be handled in that case.
>
> Not just retransmissions. The first transmission similarly may be queued.
>
> >
[...]
> > @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ the socket. A socket that has an error queued would normally block
> > other operations until the error is read. Zerocopy notifications have
> > a zero error code, however, to not block send and recv calls.
> >
> > +For protocols like TCP, where retransmissions can occur after the
> > +application is done with a given connection, applications should signal
> > +the close to the peer via shutdown(2), and keep polling the error queue
> > +until all transmissions have completed.
>
> A socket must not be closed until all completion notifications have
> been received.
>
> Calling shutdown is an optional step. It may be sufficient to simply
> delay close.
Thank you for the feedback, that helps!
What do you think of the attached patch?
Frederik
Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@...il.com>
View attachment "patch" of type "text/plain" (1156 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists