[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YphVB3EGzcLtZxvQ@unreal>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 09:13:27 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: adjust MELLANOX ETHERNET INNOVA DRIVERS to
TLS support removal
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 21:08:06 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:30:39AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > Thanks, we will submit it once net-next will be open.
> > >
> > > It should go via net FWIW.
> >
> > I'm slightly confused here.
> >
> > According to net policy, the patches that goes there should have Fixes
> > line, but Fixes lines are added for bugs [1].
> >
> > This forgotten line in MAINTAINERS doesn't cause to any harm to
> > users/developers.
>
> Fair, maybe I worded it too strongly. I should have said something like
> "FWIW it's okay for MAINTAINERS updates to go via net".
>
> Documentation/ patches and MAINTAINERS are special, they can go into
> net without a Fixes tag so that changes to get_maintainer output and
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/ propagate quickly.
Awesome, thanks
>
> > So when should I put Fixes line in netdev?
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211208070842.0ace6747@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists