| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Ypnf/pOC0zaFjF1s@krava>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:18:38 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: Force cookies array to follow symbols
sorting
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:01:07PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 1:57 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > When user specifies symbols and cookies for kprobe_multi link
> > interface it's very likely the cookies will be misplaced and
> > returned to wrong functions (via get_attach_cookie helper).
> >
> > The reason is that to resolve the provided functions we sort
> > them before passing them to ftrace_lookup_symbols, but we do
> > not do the same sort on the cookie values.
> >
> > Fixing this by using sort_r function with custom swap callback
> > that swaps cookie values as well.
> >
> > Fixes: 0236fec57a15 ("bpf: Resolve symbols with ftrace_lookup_symbols for kprobe multi link")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 10b157a6d73e..e5c423b835ab 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -2423,7 +2423,12 @@ kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long entry_ip,
> > kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, entry_ip, regs);
> > }
> >
> > -static int symbols_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> > +struct multi_symbols_sort {
> > + const char **funcs;
> > + u64 *cookies;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int symbols_cmp_r(const void *a, const void *b, const void *priv)
> > {
> > const char **str_a = (const char **) a;
> > const char **str_b = (const char **) b;
> > @@ -2431,6 +2436,25 @@ static int symbols_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> > return strcmp(*str_a, *str_b);
> > }
> >
> > +static void symbols_swap_r(void *a, void *b, int size, const void *priv)
> > +{
> > + const struct multi_symbols_sort *data = priv;
> > + const char **name_a = a, **name_b = b;
> > + u64 *cookie_a, *cookie_b;
> > +
> > + cookie_a = data->cookies + (name_a - data->funcs);
> > + cookie_b = data->cookies + (name_b - data->funcs);
> > +
> > + /* swap name_a/name_b and cookie_a/cookie_b values */
> > + swap(*name_a, *name_b);
> > + swap(*cookie_a, *cookie_b);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int symbols_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> > +{
> > + return symbols_cmp_r(a, b, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > {
> > struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link = NULL;
> > @@ -2468,6 +2492,19 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> > if (!addrs)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.cookies);
> > + if (ucookies) {
> > + cookies = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!cookies) {
> > + err = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + if (copy_from_user(cookies, ucookies, size)) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > if (uaddrs) {
> > if (copy_from_user(addrs, uaddrs, size)) {
> > err = -EFAULT;
> > @@ -2480,26 +2517,24 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> > if (err)
> > goto error;
> >
> > - sort(us.syms, cnt, sizeof(*us.syms), symbols_cmp, NULL);
> > + if (cookies) {
> > + struct multi_symbols_sort data = {
> > + .cookies = cookies,
> > + .funcs = us.syms,
> > + };
> > +
> > + sort_r(us.syms, cnt, sizeof(*us.syms), symbols_cmp_r,
> > + symbols_swap_r, &data);
> > + } else {
> > + sort(us.syms, cnt, sizeof(*us.syms), symbols_cmp, NULL);
> > + }
>
> maybe just always do sort_r, swap callback can just check if cookie
> array is NULL and if not, additionally swap cookies? why have all
> these different callbacks and complicate the code unnecessarily?
right, good idea.. will change
thanks,
jirka
>
> > +
> > err = ftrace_lookup_symbols(us.syms, cnt, addrs);
> > free_user_syms(&us);
> > if (err)
> > goto error;
> > }
> >
> > - ucookies = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->link_create.kprobe_multi.cookies);
> > - if (ucookies) {
> > - cookies = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!cookies) {
> > - err = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto error;
> > - }
> > - if (copy_from_user(cookies, ucookies, size)) {
> > - err = -EFAULT;
> > - goto error;
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > link = kzalloc(sizeof(*link), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!link) {
> > err = -ENOMEM;
> > --
> > 2.35.3
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists