netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] can: refactoring of can-dev module and of Kbuild

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 Jun 2022 22:57:03 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Max Staudt <max@...as.org>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] can: refactoring of can-dev module and of Kbuild

On Sun. 5 juin 2022 at 19:39, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On 05.06.2022 01:32:15, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > On Sun. 5 juin 2022 at 00:18, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > > On 04.06.2022 23:59:48, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > > > > > Fine, but I need a bit of guidance here. To provide a tag, I need to
> > > > > > have my own git repository hosted online, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > That is one option.
> > > >
> > > > This suggests that there are other options? What would be those other
> > > > options?
> > >
> > > 2. git.kernel.org (most preferred)
> > > 3. github.com (have to ask Davem/Jakub)
> > >
> > > > > > Is GitHub OK or should I create one on https://git.kernel.org/?
> > > > >
> > > > > Some maintainers don't like github, let's wait what Davem and Jakub say.
> > > > > I think for git.kernel.org you need a GPG key with signatures of 3 users
> > > > > of git.kernel.org.
> > > >
> > > > Personally, I would also prefer getting my own git.kernel.org account.
> > >
> > > See https://korg.docs.kernel.org/accounts.html
> >
> > Thanks for the link. I will have a look at it tomorrow (or the day
> > after tomorrow in the worst case).
> >
> > Meanwhile, I will send the v5 which should address all your comments.
>
> /me just realized that merged are independent of pull requests. I can
> create a local branch and merge it, as Davem and Jakub do it. I've added
> your v5 to can-next/master as a merge and I'll include this in my next
> PR to net-next if Davem and Jakub are OK with merges in my branch.

So my dreams of getting my kernel.org account swag just evaporated
(just kidding :))
I think I will prepare a GPG key just to be ready in the opportunity
to get it signed pop-up one day.

Happy to see that this is reaching an end. Honestly speaking, the
menuconfig cleanup was not my most exciting contribution (euphemism)
but was still a necessity. Glad that this is nearly over after more
than 80 messages in the full thread (including all five versions). If
I recall correctly, this is the longest thread we had in the last two
years. And thanks again to Max, Oliver and you for animating the
debate!


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol