lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 16:23:25 -0700 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com> CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH net] af_unix: Fix a data-race in unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(). unix_dgram_poll() calls unix_dgram_peer_wake_me() without `other`'s lock held and check if its receive queue is full. Here we need to use unix_recvq_full_lockless() instead of unix_recvq_full(), otherwise KCSAN will report a data-race. Fixes: 7d267278a9ec ("unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue") Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> --- As Eric noted in commit 04f08eb44b501, I think rest of unix_recvq_full() can be turned into the lockless version. After this merge window, I can send a follow-up patch if there is no objection. --- net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 654dcef7cfb3..2206e6f8902d 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(struct sock *sk, struct sock *other) * -ECONNREFUSED. Otherwise, if we haven't queued any skbs * to other and its full, we will hang waiting for POLLOUT. */ - if (unix_recvq_full(other) && !sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD)) + if (unix_recvq_full_lockless(other) && !sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD)) return 1; if (connected) -- 2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists