[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 08:57:25 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Add BPF-helper for accessing CLOCK_TAI
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 3:38 AM Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
>
> Commit 3dc6ffae2da2 ("timekeeping: Introduce fast accessor to clock tai")
> introduced a fast and NMI-safe accessor for CLOCK_TAI. Especially in time
> sensitive networks (TSN), where all nodes are synchronized by Precision Time
> Protocol (PTP), it's helpful to have the possibility to generate timestamps
> based on CLOCK_TAI instead of CLOCK_MONOTONIC. With a BPF helper for TAI in
> place, it becomes very convenient to correlate activity across different
> machines in the network.
That's a fresh feature. It feels risky to bake it into uapi already.
imo it would be better to annotate tk_core variable in vmlinux BTF.
Then progs will be able to read all possible timekeeper offsets.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists