[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607171732.21191-8-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:17:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: add debug checks in napi_consume_skb and __napi_alloc_skb()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Commit 6454eca81eae ("net: Use lockdep_assert_in_softirq()
in napi_consume_skb()") added a check in napi_consume_skb()
which is a bit weak.
napi_consume_skb() and __napi_alloc_skb() should only
be used from BH context, not from hard irq or nmi context,
otherwise we could have races.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index cf83d9b8f41dc28ae11391f2651e5abee3dcde8f..fec75f8bf1f416f05c14f76009a15412b2559b6e 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len,
struct sk_buff *skb;
void *data;
+ DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
len += NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN;
/* If requested length is either too small or too big,
@@ -981,7 +982,7 @@ void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget)
return;
}
- lockdep_assert_in_softirq();
+ DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_softirq());
if (!skb_unref(skb))
return;
--
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists