netdev - Re: [PATCH net] tls: Rename TLS_INFO_ZC_SENDFILE to TLS_INFO_ZC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220608074751.09f29e7f@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 07:47:51 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        "Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tls: Rename TLS_INFO_ZC_SENDFILE to TLS_INFO_ZC_TX

On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:22:36 +0300 Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> To embrace possible future optimizations of TLS, rename zerocopy
> sendfile definitions to more generic ones:
> 
> * setsockopt: TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_SENDFILE- > TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY
> * sock_diag: TLS_INFO_ZC_SENDFILE -> TLS_INFO_ZC_TX

Why don't we throw in the _RO as well if we're renaming?