netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE() in sk_stream_kill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89iJ2n8D+0UbbcQVyTyNqhrtaYQBSoFM0fvo85RD2VPkTCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:25:32 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE() in sk_stream_kill_queues()

On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:11 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 21:10 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue,  7 Jun 2022 10:17:28 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > sk_stream_kill_queues() has three checks which have been
> > > useful to detect kernel bugs in the past.
> > >
> > > However they are potentially a problem because they
> > > could flood the syslog, and really only a developper
> > > can make sense of them.
> > >
> > > Keep the checks for CONFIG_DEBUG_NET=y builds,
> > > and issue them once only.
> >
> > I feel like 3 & 4 had caught plenty of bugs which triggered only
> > in production / at scale.
> >
> I have a somewhat similar experience: I hit a few races spotted by the
> warnings in patches 3 and 4 observable only in non-debug build.
>
> The checks in patch 4 are almost rendundant with the ones in patch 3 -
> at least in my experience I could not trigger the first without hitting
> the latter. Perhaps we could use WARN_ON_ONCE only in patch 3?
>

Well, I certainly can stick to WARN_ON_ONCE().

For syzbot it is really the same thing.