| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 11:58:52 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 3/6] net/mlx5e: CT: Fix cleanup of CT before cleanup of TC ct rules
From: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
CT cleanup assumes that all tc rules were deleted first, and so
is free to delete the CT shared resources (e.g the dr_action
fwd_action which is shared for all tuples). But currently for
uplink, this is happens in reverse, causing the below trace.
CT cleanup is called from:
mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx()->
mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup()->mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup()->
mlx5_tc_ct_clean()
Only afterwards, tc cleanup is called from:
mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx()->mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup()
which would have deleted all the tc ct rules, and so delete
all the offloaded tuples.
Fix this reversing the order of init and on cleanup, which
will result in tc cleanup then ct cleanup.
[ 9443.593347] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 206774 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_action.c:1882 mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593349] Modules linked in: act_ct nf_flow_table rdma_ucm(O) rdma_cm(O) iw_cm(O) ib_ipoib(O) ib_cm(O) ib_umad(O) mlx5_core(O-) mlxfw(O) mlxdevm(O) auxiliary(O) ib_uverbs(O) psample ib_core(O) mlx_compat(O) ip_gre gre ip_tunnel act_vlan bonding geneve esp6_offload esp6 esp4_offload esp4 act_tunnel_key vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel act_mirred act_skbedit act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress nfnetlink_cttimeout nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo 8021q garp stp ipmi_devintf mrp ipmi_msghandler llc openvswitch nsh nf_conncount nf_nat mst_pciconf(O) dm_multipath sbsa_gwdt uio_pdrv_genirq uio mlxbf_pmc mlxbf_pka mlx_trio mlx_bootctl(O) bluefield_edac sch_fq_codel ip_tables ipv6 crc_ccitt btrfs zstd_compress raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor xor_neon raid6_pq raid1 raid0 crct10dif_ce i2c_mlxbf gpio_mlxbf2 mlxbf_gige aes_neon_bs aes_neon_blk [last unloaded: mlx5_ib]
[ 9443.593419] CPU: 2 PID: 206774 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 5.4.0-1023.24.gc14613d-bluefield #1
[ 9443.593422] Hardware name: https://www.mellanox.com BlueField SoC/BlueField SoC, BIOS BlueField:143ebaf Jan 11 2022
[ 9443.593424] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO)
[ 9443.593489] pc : mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593545] lr : mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593546] sp : ffff8000135dbab0
[ 9443.593548] x29: ffff8000135dbab0 x28: ffff0003a6ab8e80
[ 9443.593550] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff0003e07d7000
[ 9443.593552] x25: ffff800009609de0 x24: ffff000397fb2120
[ 9443.593554] x23: ffff0003975c0000 x22: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593556] x21: ffff0003975f08c0 x20: ffff800009609de0
[ 9443.593558] x19: ffff0003c8a13380 x18: 0000000000000014
[ 9443.593560] x17: 0000000067f5f125 x16: 000000006529c620
[ 9443.593561] x15: 000000000000000b x14: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593563] x13: 0000000000000002 x12: 0000000000000001
[ 9443.593565] x11: ffff800011108868 x10: 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593567] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff8000117fb270
[ 9443.593569] x7 : ffff0003ebc01288 x6 : 0000000000000000
[ 9443.593571] x5 : ffff800009591ab8 x4 : fffffe000f6d9a20
[ 9443.593572] x3 : 0000000080040001 x2 : fffffe000f6d9a20
[ 9443.593574] x1 : ffff8000095901d8 x0 : 0000000000000025
[ 9443.593577] Call trace:
[ 9443.593634] mlx5dr_action_destroy+0x188/0x1a0 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593688] mlx5_ct_fs_smfs_destroy+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593743] mlx5_tc_ct_clean+0x34/0xa8 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593797] mlx5e_tc_esw_cleanup+0x58/0x88 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593851] mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup+0x24/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593905] mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx+0x6c/0x78 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.593959] mlx5e_detach_netdev+0x74/0x98 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594013] mlx5e_netdev_change_profile+0x70/0x180 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594067] mlx5e_netdev_attach_nic_profile+0x34/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594122] mlx5e_vport_rep_unload+0x15c/0x1a8 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594177] mlx5_eswitch_unregister_vport_reps+0x228/0x298 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594231] mlx5e_rep_remove+0x2c/0x38 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594236] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x30/0x50 [auxiliary]
[ 9443.594246] device_release_driver_internal+0x108/0x1d0
[ 9443.594248] driver_detach+0x5c/0xe8
[ 9443.594250] bus_remove_driver+0x64/0xd8
[ 9443.594253] driver_unregister+0x38/0x60
[ 9443.594255] auxiliary_driver_unregister+0x24/0x38 [auxiliary]
[ 9443.594311] mlx5e_rep_cleanup+0x20/0x38 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594365] mlx5e_cleanup+0x18/0x30 [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594419] cleanup+0xc/0x20cc [mlx5_core]
[ 9443.594424] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x154/0x2b0
[ 9443.594429] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf4/0x200
[ 9443.594432] el0_svc_handler+0x38/0xa8
[ 9443.594435] el0_svc+0x10/0x26c
Fixes: d1a3138f7913 ("net/mlx5e: TC, Move flow hashtable to be per rep")
Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 31 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
index eb90e79388f1..f797fd97d305 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
@@ -950,6 +950,13 @@ static int mlx5e_init_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
return err;
}
+static void mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
+{
+ mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister(rpriv);
+ mlx5e_rep_bond_cleanup(rpriv);
+ mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup(rpriv);
+}
+
static int mlx5e_init_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
{
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
@@ -961,42 +968,36 @@ static int mlx5e_init_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
return err;
}
- err = mlx5e_tc_ht_init(&rpriv->tc_ht);
- if (err)
- goto err_ht_init;
-
if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK) {
err = mlx5e_init_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
if (err)
goto err_init_tx;
}
+ err = mlx5e_tc_ht_init(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_ht_init;
+
return 0;
-err_init_tx:
- mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
err_ht_init:
+ if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
+ mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
+err_init_tx:
mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
return err;
}
-static void mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv)
-{
- mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister(rpriv);
- mlx5e_rep_bond_cleanup(rpriv);
- mlx5e_rep_tc_cleanup(rpriv);
-}
-
static void mlx5e_cleanup_rep_tx(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
{
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = priv->ppriv;
- mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
+ mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
if (rpriv->rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK)
mlx5e_cleanup_uplink_rep_tx(rpriv);
- mlx5e_tc_ht_cleanup(&rpriv->tc_ht);
+ mlx5e_destroy_tises(priv);
}
static void mlx5e_rep_enable(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists