[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f263209c-509c-5f6b-865c-cd5d38d29549@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 16:58:08 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, steffen.klassert@...unet.com, jreuter@...na.de,
razor@...ckwall.org, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, ivecera@...hat.com,
jmaloy@...hat.com, ying.xue@...driver.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, yajun.deng@...ux.dev, atenart@...nel.org,
richardsonnick@...gle.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename reference+tracking helpers
On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
> short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or
> maybe netdev_hold_notrack().
I like that option. Similar to the old nla_parse functions that were
renamed with _deprecated - makes it easier to catch new uses.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists