lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqAJeHAL57cB9qJk@Laptop-X1>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 10:29:12 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] move AF_XDP APIs to libxdp

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > libbpf APIs for AF_XDP are deprecated starting from v0.7.
> > Let's move to libxdp.
> >
> > The first patch removed the usage of bpf_prog_load_xattr(). As we
> > will remove the GCC diagnostic declaration in later patches.
> 
> Kartikeya started working on moving some of the XDP-related samples into
> the xdp-tools repo[0]; maybe it's better to just include these AF_XDP
> programs into that instead of adding a build-dep on libxdp to the kernel
> samples?

OK, makes sense to me. Should we remove these samples after the xdp-tools PR
merged? What about xdpxceiver.c in selftests/bpf? Should that also be moved to
xdp-tools?

Thanks
Hangbin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ