lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220607204416.3zjqhwmh3i25u6ev@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:44:16 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 05/11] bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for
 BPF_LSM_CGROUP

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 03:46:25PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:59 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:02:12PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > index a27a6a7bd852..cb3338ef01e0 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> > > @@ -1035,6 +1035,7 @@ static int cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > >  static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > >                             union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> > >  {
> > > +     __u32 __user *prog_attach_flags = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_attach_flags);
> > >       __u32 __user *prog_ids = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->query.prog_ids);
> > >       enum bpf_attach_type type = attr->query.attach_type;
> > >       enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type atype;
> > > @@ -1042,50 +1043,92 @@ static int __cgroup_bpf_query(struct cgroup *cgrp, const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > >       struct hlist_head *progs;
> > >       struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > >       int cnt, ret = 0, i;
> > > +     int total_cnt = 0;
> > >       u32 flags;
> > >
> > > -     atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
> > > -     if (atype < 0)
> > > -             return -EINVAL;
> > > +     enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type from_atype, to_atype;
> > >
> > > -     progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > -     flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > > +     if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) {
> > > +             from_atype = CGROUP_LSM_START;
> > > +             to_atype = CGROUP_LSM_END;
> > Enforce prog_attach_flags for BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
> >
> >                 if (total_cnt && !prog_attach_flags)
> >                         return -EINVAL;
> 
> All the comments make sense, will apply. The only thing that I'll
> probably keep as is is the copy_to_user(flags) part. We can't move it
> above because it hasn't been properly initialized there.
Initialize earlier:

if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
{
	from_atype = CGROUP_LSM_START;
	to_atype = CGROUP_LSM_END;
	flags = 0;
} else {
	from_atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
	if (from_atype < 0)
		 return -EINVAL;
	to_atype = from_atype;
	flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[to_atype];
}

if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags...))
	/* ... */

for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
	/* Figuring out total_cnt.
	 * No need to get the flags here.
	 /
}

> 
> What I think I'll do is:
> 
> if (atype != to_atype) /* exported via prog_attach_flags */
Check "from_atype != to_atype" and then reset flags back to 0?
Yeah, that will work.  I think in that case checking
BPF_LSM_CGROUP is more straight forward.

Also no strong opinion here.  was just thinking to avoid
multiple BPF_LSM_CGROUP checks because copying the flags
before and after the for-loop is the same.


>   flags = 0;
> copy_to_user(.., flags,..);

> 
> That seems to better describe why we're not doing it?
> 
> 
> > > +     } else {
> > > +             from_atype = to_cgroup_bpf_attach_type(type);
> > > +             if (from_atype < 0)
> > > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > > +             to_atype = from_atype;
> > > +     }
> > >
> > > -     effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > -                                           lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > > +     for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
> > > +             progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > +             flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > >
> > > -     if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > -             cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > -     else
> > > -             cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
> > > +             effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > +                                                   lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > nit. This can be done under the BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE case below.
> >
> > >
> > > -     if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > -             return -EFAULT;
> > > -     if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &cnt, sizeof(cnt)))
> > > +             if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > +                     total_cnt += bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > +             else
> > > +                     total_cnt += prog_list_length(progs);
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     if (type != BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
> > > +             if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > +                     return -EFAULT;
> > nit. Move this copy_to_user(&uattr->query.attach_flags,...) to the
> > 'if (type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) { from_atype = .... } else { ... }' above.
> > That will save a BPF_LSM_CGROUP test.
> >
> > I think the '== BPF_LSM_CGROUP' case needs to copy a 0 to user also.
> >
> > > +     if (copy_to_user(&uattr->query.prog_cnt, &total_cnt, sizeof(total_cnt)))
> > >               return -EFAULT;
> > > -     if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !cnt)
> > > +     if (attr->query.prog_cnt == 0 || !prog_ids || !total_cnt)
> > >               /* return early if user requested only program count + flags */
> > >               return 0;
> > > -     if (attr->query.prog_cnt < cnt) {
> > > -             cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
> > > +
> > > +     if (attr->query.prog_cnt < total_cnt) {
> > > +             total_cnt = attr->query.prog_cnt;
> > >               ret = -ENOSPC;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > -     if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
> > > -             return bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> > > -     } else {
> > > -             struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> > > -             u32 id;
> > > +     for (atype = from_atype; atype <= to_atype; atype++) {
> > > +             if (total_cnt <= 0)
> > nit. total_cnt cannot be -ve ?
> > !total_cnt instead ?
> > and may be do it in the for-loop test.
> >
> > > +                     break;
> > >
> > > -             i = 0;
> > > -             hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
> > > -                     prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
> > > -                     id = prog->aux->id;
> > > -                     if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> > > -                             return -EFAULT;
> > > -                     if (++i == cnt)
> > > -                             break;
> > > +             progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[atype];
> > > +             flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[atype];
> > > +
> > > +             effective = rcu_dereference_protected(cgrp->bpf.effective[atype],
> > > +                                                   lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex));
> > nit. This can be done under the BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE case below.
> >
> > > +
> > > +             if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)
> > > +                     cnt = bpf_prog_array_length(effective);
> > > +             else
> > > +                     cnt = prog_list_length(progs);
> > > +
> > > +             if (cnt >= total_cnt)
> > > +                     cnt = total_cnt;
> > nit. This seems to be the only reason that
> > the "if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE)"
> > need to be broken up into two halves.  One above and one below.
> > It does not save much code.  How about repeating this one line
> > 'cnt = min_t(int, cnt, total_cnt);' instead ?
> >
> > > +
> > > +             if (attr->query.query_flags & BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE) {
> > > +                     ret = bpf_prog_array_copy_to_user(effective, prog_ids, cnt);
> > > +             } else {
> > > +                     struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
> > > +                     u32 id;
> > > +
> > > +                     i = 0;
> > > +                     hlist_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node) {
> > > +                             prog = prog_list_prog(pl);
> > > +                             id = prog->aux->id;
> > > +                             if (copy_to_user(prog_ids + i, &id, sizeof(id)))
> > > +                                     return -EFAULT;
> > > +                             if (++i == cnt)
> > > +                                     break;
> > > +                     }
> > >               }
> > > +
> > > +             if (prog_attach_flags)
> > > +                     for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
> > > +                             if (copy_to_user(prog_attach_flags + i, &flags, sizeof(flags)))
> > > +                                     return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +             prog_ids += cnt;
> > > +             total_cnt -= cnt;
> > > +             if (prog_attach_flags)
> > > +                     prog_attach_flags += cnt;
> > nit. Merge this into the above "if (prog_attach_flags)" case.
> >
> > >       }
> > >       return ret;
> > >  }
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > index a237be4f8bb3..27492d44133f 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > @@ -3520,7 +3520,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> > >       }
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_cnt
> > > +#define BPF_PROG_QUERY_LAST_FIELD query.prog_attach_flags
> > >
> > >  static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > >                         union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> > > @@ -3556,6 +3556,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
> > >       case BPF_CGROUP_SYSCTL:
> > >       case BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT:
> > >       case BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT:
> > > +     case BPF_LSM_CGROUP:
> > >               return cgroup_bpf_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > >       case BPF_LIRC_MODE2:
> > >               return lirc_prog_query(attr, uattr);
> > > @@ -4066,6 +4067,9 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
> > >
> > >       if (prog->aux->btf)
> > >               info.btf_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->btf);
> > > +     info.attach_btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
> > > +     if (prog->aux->attach_btf)
> > > +             info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->attach_btf);
> > Need this also:
> >
> >         else if (prog->aux->dst_prog)
> >                 info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->dst_prog->aux->attach_btf);
> >
> > >
> > >       ulen = info.nr_func_info;
> > >       info.nr_func_info = prog->aux->func_info_cnt;
> > > --
> > > 2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog
> > >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ