[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220609040141.GA21971@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 21:01:41 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lasse Johnsen <l@...johnsen.me>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/3] net: phy: broadcom: Add PTP support for
some Broadcom PHYs.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 02:29:15PM -0700, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Do you have a stress test to verify one way or the other?
You can set a large freq. offset on the server. For example
phc_ctl eth0 -- freq 500000
for 500 ppm and see what the client does.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists