[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGG=3QU0XJhQKJXLMayOkQSiF2yjBi2p2TEZ9KNTzU5mmye-gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:16:16 -0700
From: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Wendling <isanbard@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Clang -Wformat warning fixes
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 4:03 PM Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de> wrote:
> On Friday 2022-06-10 00:49, Bill Wendling wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:25 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:16:19 +0000 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This patch set fixes some clang warnings when -Wformat is enabled.
> >>
> >> tldr:
> >>
> >> - printk(msg);
> >> + printk("%s", msg);
> >>
> >> Otherwise these changes are a
> >> useless consumer of runtime resources.
> >
> >Calling a "printf" style function is already insanely expensive.
> >[...]
> >The "printk" and similar functions all have the "__printf" attribute.
> >I don't know of a modification to that attribute which can turn off
> >this type of check.
>
> Perhaps you can split vprintk_store in the middle (after the call to
> vsnprintf), and offer the second half as a function of its own (e.g.
> "puts"). Then the tldr could be
>
> - printk(msg);
> + puts(msg);
That might be a nice compromise. Andrew, what do you think?
-bw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists