netdev - [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  8 Jun 2022 23:34:09 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory_allocated

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

We plan keeping sk->sk_forward_alloc as small as possible
in future patches.

This means we are going to call sk_memory_allocated_add()
and sk_memory_allocated_sub() more often.

Implement a per-cpu cache of +1/-1 MB, to reduce number
of changes to sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated, which
would otherwise be cause of false sharing.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 825f8cbf791f02d798f17dd4f7a2659cebb0e98a..59040fee74e7de8d63fbf719f46e172906c134bb 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1397,22 +1397,48 @@ static inline bool sk_under_memory_pressure(const struct sock *sk)
 	return !!*sk->sk_prot->memory_pressure;
 }
 
+static inline long
+proto_memory_allocated(const struct proto *prot)
+{
+	return max(0L, atomic_long_read(prot->memory_allocated));
+}
+
 static inline long
 sk_memory_allocated(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-	return atomic_long_read(sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
+	return proto_memory_allocated(sk->sk_prot);
 }
 
+/* 1 MB per cpu, in page units */
+#define SK_MEMORY_PCPU_RESERVE (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))
+
 static inline long
 sk_memory_allocated_add(struct sock *sk, int amt)
 {
-	return atomic_long_add_return(amt, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
+	int local_reserve;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	local_reserve = __this_cpu_add_return(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, amt);
+	if (local_reserve >= SK_MEMORY_PCPU_RESERVE) {
+		__this_cpu_sub(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, local_reserve);
+		atomic_long_add(local_reserve, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
+	}
+	preempt_enable();
+	return sk_memory_allocated(sk);
 }
 
 static inline void
 sk_memory_allocated_sub(struct sock *sk, int amt)
 {
-	atomic_long_sub(amt, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
+	int local_reserve;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	local_reserve = __this_cpu_sub_return(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, amt);
+	if (local_reserve <= -SK_MEMORY_PCPU_RESERVE) {
+		__this_cpu_sub(*sk->sk_prot->per_cpu_fw_alloc, local_reserve);
+		atomic_long_add(local_reserve, sk->sk_prot->memory_allocated);
+	}
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 #define SK_ALLOC_PERCPU_COUNTER_BATCH 16
@@ -1441,12 +1467,6 @@ proto_sockets_allocated_sum_positive(struct proto *prot)
 	return percpu_counter_sum_positive(prot->sockets_allocated);
 }
 
-static inline long
-proto_memory_allocated(struct proto *prot)
-{
-	return atomic_long_read(prot->memory_allocated);
-}
-
 static inline bool
 proto_memory_pressure(struct proto *prot)
 {
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog