netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename reference+tracking helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 09 Jun 2022 13:49:48 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        jreuter@...na.de, razor@...ckwall.org,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, ivecera@...hat.com,
        Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
        Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, richardsonnick@...gle.com,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: rename reference+tracking helpers

On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 16:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:58 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
> > > short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or
> > > maybe netdev_hold_notrack().
> > 
> > I like that option. Similar to the old nla_parse functions that were
> > renamed with _deprecated - makes it easier to catch new uses.
> 
> I think we need to clearly document the needed conversions for future
> bugfix backports.
> 

To be on the same page: do you think we need something under
Documentation with this patch? or with the later dev_hold rename? or
did I misunderstood completely?

Thanks!

Paolo