lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 12:26:47 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Harsh Modi <harshmodi@...gle.com>,
        Paul Chaignon <paul@...ium.io>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Revert "bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK"

This reverts commit a777e18f1bcd32528ff5dfd10a6629b655b05eb8.

In commit a777e18f1bcd ("bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of
RLIMIT_MEMLOCK"), we removed the rlimit bump in bpftool, because the
kernel has switched to memcg-based memory accounting. Thanks to the
LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, we attempted to keep compatibility
with other systems and ask libbpf to raise the limit for us if
necessary.

How do we know if memcg-based accounting is supported? There is a probe
in libbpf to check this. But this probe currently relies on the
availability of a given BPF helper, bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns(), which
landed in the same kernel version as the memory accounting change. This
works in the generic case, but it may fail, for example, if the helper
function has been backported to an older kernel. This has been observed
for Google Cloud's Container-Optimized OS (COS), where the helper is
available but rlimit is still in use. The probe succeeds, the rlimit is
not raised, and probing features with bpftool, for example, fails.

A patch was submitted [0] to update this probe in libbpf, based on what
the cilium/ebpf Go library does [1]. It would lower the soft rlimit to
0, attempt to load a BPF object, and reset the rlimit. But it may induce
some hard-to-debug flakiness if another process starts, or the current
application is killed, while the rlimit is reduced, and the approach was
discarded.

As a workaround to ensure that the rlimit bump does not depend on the
availability of a given helper, we restore the unconditional rlimit bump
in bpftool for now.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220609143614.97837-1-quentin@isovalent.com/
[1] https://github.com/cilium/ebpf/blob/v0.9.0/rlimit/rlimit.go#L39

Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c     | 8 ++++++++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c    | 2 ++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c       | 6 +++---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h       | 2 ++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c        | 2 ++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c       | 1 +
 tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c       | 3 +++
 tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c | 2 ++
 8 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
index a45b42ee8ab0..a0d4acd7c54a 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/common.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <linux/magic.h>
 #include <net/if.h>
 #include <sys/mount.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <sys/vfs.h>
 
@@ -72,6 +73,13 @@ static bool is_bpffs(char *path)
 	return (unsigned long)st_fs.f_type == BPF_FS_MAGIC;
 }
 
+void set_max_rlimit(void)
+{
+	struct rlimit rinf = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
+
+	setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &rinf);
+}
+
 static int
 mnt_fs(const char *target, const char *type, char *buff, size_t bufflen)
 {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
index cc9e4df8c58e..bac4ef428a02 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c
@@ -1167,6 +1167,8 @@ static int do_probe(int argc, char **argv)
 	__u32 ifindex = 0;
 	char *ifname;
 
+	set_max_rlimit();
+
 	while (argc) {
 		if (is_prefix(*argv, "kernel")) {
 			if (target != COMPONENT_UNSPEC) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
index 9062ef2b8767..e81227761f5d 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
@@ -507,9 +507,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		 * It will still be rejected if users use LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL
 		 * mode for loading generated skeleton.
 		 */
-		libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS);
-	} else {
-		libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK);
+		ret = libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS);
+		if (ret)
+			p_err("failed to enable libbpf strict mode: %d", ret);
 	}
 
 	argc -= optind;
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
index 6c311f47147e..589cb76b227a 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.h
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ int detect_common_prefix(const char *arg, ...);
 void fprint_hex(FILE *f, void *arg, unsigned int n, const char *sep);
 void usage(void) __noreturn;
 
+void set_max_rlimit(void);
+
 int mount_tracefs(const char *target);
 
 struct obj_ref {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
index 800834be1bcb..38b6bc9c26c3 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
@@ -1326,6 +1326,8 @@ static int do_create(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
+	set_max_rlimit();
+
 	fd = bpf_map_create(map_type, map_name, key_size, value_size, max_entries, &attr);
 	if (fd < 0) {
 		p_err("map create failed: %s", strerror(errno));
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
index e2d00d3cd868..bb6c969a114a 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/pids.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ int build_obj_refs_table(struct hashmap **map, enum bpf_obj_type type)
 		p_err("failed to create hashmap for PID references");
 		return -1;
 	}
+	set_max_rlimit();
 
 	skel = pid_iter_bpf__open();
 	if (!skel) {
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index e71f0b2da50b..f081de398b60 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -1590,6 +1590,8 @@ static int load_with_options(int argc, char **argv, bool first_prog_only)
 		}
 	}
 
+	set_max_rlimit();
+
 	if (verifier_logs)
 		/* log_level1 + log_level2 + stats, but not stable UAPI */
 		open_opts.kernel_log_level = 1 + 2 + 4;
@@ -2287,6 +2289,7 @@ static int do_profile(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
+	set_max_rlimit();
 	err = profiler_bpf__load(profile_obj);
 	if (err) {
 		p_err("failed to load profile_obj");
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
index 2535f079ed67..e08a6ff2866c 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/struct_ops.c
@@ -501,6 +501,8 @@ static int do_register(int argc, char **argv)
 	if (libbpf_get_error(obj))
 		return -1;
 
+	set_max_rlimit();
+
 	if (bpf_object__load(obj)) {
 		bpf_object__close(obj);
 		return -1;
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ