netdev - [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf ppc32: Add instructions for atomic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220610155552.25892-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:25:52 +0530
From:   Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>,
        Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] bpf ppc32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg

This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc32, both
of which include the BPF_FETCH flag.  The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg
operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register
fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API
calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's
atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the
same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0.

  BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg);

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
---

Changes in v2:
* Moved variable declaration to avoid late declaration error on
  some compilers.
* Tried to make code readable and compact.


 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 28dc6a1a8f2f..43f1c76d48ce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 		u32 ax_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_AX);
 		u32 tmp_reg = bpf_to_ppc(TMP_REG);
 		u32 size = BPF_SIZE(code);
+		u32 save_reg, ret_reg;
 		s16 off = insn[i].off;
 		s32 imm = insn[i].imm;
 		bool func_addr_fixed;
@@ -799,6 +800,9 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 		 * BPF_STX ATOMIC (atomic ops)
 		 */
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W:
+			save_reg = _R0;
+			ret_reg = src_reg;
+
 			bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, tmp_reg);
 			bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, ax_reg);
 
@@ -829,6 +833,21 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH:
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_XOR(_R0, _R0, src_reg));
 				break;
+			case BPF_CMPXCHG:
+				/*
+				 * Return old value in BPF_REG_0 for BPF_CMPXCHG &
+				 * in src_reg for other cases.
+				 */
+				ret_reg = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0);
+
+				/* Compare with old value in BPF_REG_0 */
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_0), _R0));
+				/* Don't set if different from old value */
+				PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx + 3) * 4);
+				fallthrough;
+			case BPF_XCHG:
+				save_reg = src_reg;
+				break;
 			default:
 				pr_err_ratelimited("eBPF filter atomic op code %02x (@%d) unsupported\n",
 						   code, i);
@@ -836,15 +855,15 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 			}
 
 			/* store new value */
-			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(_R0, tmp_reg, dst_reg));
+			EMIT(PPC_RAW_STWCX(save_reg, tmp_reg, dst_reg));
 			/* we're done if this succeeded */
 			PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, tmp_idx);
 
 			/* For the BPF_FETCH variant, get old data into src_reg */
 			if (imm & BPF_FETCH) {
-				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(src_reg, ax_reg));
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_MR(ret_reg, ax_reg));
 				if (!fp->aux->verifier_zext)
-					EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(src_reg_h, 0));
+					EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(ret_reg - 1, 0)); /* higher 32-bit */
 			}
 			break;
 
-- 
2.35.3