netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Jun 2022 21:34:11 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, senthilkumar@...eros.com,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+03110230a11411024147@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+c6dde1f690b60e0b9fbe@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] ath9k: fix use-after-free in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb

Hi Toke,

On 6/10/22 21:30, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> 
> In general, if a patch is marked as "changes requested", the right thing
> to do is to bug the submitter to resubmit. Which I guess you just did,
> so hopefully we'll get an update soon :)
> 


I agree here. The build fix is trivial, I just wanted to reply to Hillf 
like 2 weeks ago, but an email got lost in my inbox.

So, i don't know what is correct thing to do rn: wait for Hillf's reply 
or to quickly respin with build error addressed?




With regards,
Pavel Skripkin

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)