[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <724889aa6a8d4d41b8557733610c7657@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:14:45 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Jan Engelhardt' <jengelh@...i.de>
CC: 'Bill Wendling' <morbo@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bill Wendling <isanbard@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/12] Clang -Wformat warning fixes
From: Jan Engelhardt
> Sent: 10 June 2022 09:32
>
>
> On Friday 2022-06-10 10:17, David Laight wrote:
> >>
> >> Calling a "printf" style function is already insanely expensive. :-) I
> >> understand that it's not okay blithely to increase runtime resources
> >> simply because it's already slow, but in this case it's worthwhile.
> >
> >Yep, IMHO definitely should be fixed.
> >It is even possible that using "%s" is faster because the printf
> >code doesn't have to scan the string for format effectors.
>
> I see no special handling; the vsnprintf function just loops
> over fmt as usual and I see no special casing of fmt by
> e.g. strcmp(fmt, "%s") == 0 to take a shortcut.
Consider the difference between:
printf("fubar");
and
printf("%s", "fubar");
In the former all of "fubar" is checked for '%'.
In the latter only the length of "fubar" has to be counted.
FWIW the patch description should probably by:
use "%s" when formatting a single string.
(or something to that effect).
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists