[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220611171148.GA851137@euler>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:11:48 -0700
From: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 net-next 1/7] mfd: ocelot: add helper to get regmap
from a resource
Hi Andy,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 12:37:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:23 PM Colin Foster
> <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> >
> > Several ocelot-related modules are designed for MMIO / regmaps. As such,
> > they often use a combination of devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource and
> > devm_regmap_init_mmio.
> >
> > Operating in an MFD might be different, in that it could be memory mapped,
> > or it could be SPI, I2C... In these cases a fallback to use IORESOURCE_REG
> > instead of IORESOURCE_MEM becomes necessary.
> >
> > When this happens, there's redundant logic that needs to be implemented in
> > every driver. In order to avoid this redundancy, utilize a single function
> > that, if the MFD scenario is enabled, will perform this fallback logic.
>
> v10 has the same issues I have pointed out in v9.
>
> Please, take your time and instead of bombing mailing lists with new
> versions try to look how other (most recent) drivers have been done.
Yes - I recognize that my decision to try to throw in a quick fix was
the wrong one. My apologies.
When you mention looking at more recent drivers - are you referencing
the submission process, or something else?
>
> Also pay attention to the API design.
I understand if I'm making a helper function, that helper function
shouldn't change the API if it can be avoided. Hopefully the updates I
suggested are the correct ones.
Thanks again for the feedback.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists