[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz1GeVirhhCkK6ovuqhNJ7W=sxZ-eu2R4yFWAs-R3zmcTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:32:49 +0200
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 09/10] selftests: xsk: remove struct xsk_socket_info::outstanding_tx
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 5:31 PM Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Previous change makes xsk->outstanding_tx a dead code, so let's remove
> it.
Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 20 +++-----------------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> index c9385690af09..a2aa652d0bb8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
> @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ static void kick_rx(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
> exit_with_error(errno);
> }
>
> -static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
> +static void complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
> {
> unsigned int rcvd;
> u32 idx;
> @@ -824,20 +824,8 @@ static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
> kick_tx(xsk);
>
> rcvd = xsk_ring_cons__peek(&xsk->umem->cq, batch_size, &idx);
> - if (rcvd) {
> - if (rcvd > xsk->outstanding_tx) {
> - u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1);
> -
> - ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__);
> - ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr);
> - return TEST_FAILURE;
> - }
> -
> + if (rcvd)
> xsk_ring_cons__release(&xsk->umem->cq, rcvd);
> - xsk->outstanding_tx -= rcvd;
> - }
> -
> - return TEST_PASS;
> }
>
> static int receive_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobj, struct pollfd *fds)
> @@ -955,9 +943,7 @@ static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, u32 *pkt_nb)
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&pacing_mutex);
>
> xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->tx, i);
> - xsk->outstanding_tx += valid_pkts;
> - if (complete_pkts(xsk, i))
> - return TEST_FAILURE;
> + complete_pkts(xsk, i);
>
> usleep(10);
> return TEST_PASS;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
> index f364a92675f8..12b792004163 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h
> @@ -104,7 +104,6 @@ struct xsk_socket_info {
> struct xsk_ring_prod tx;
> struct xsk_umem_info *umem;
> struct xsk_socket *xsk;
> - u32 outstanding_tx;
> u32 rxqsize;
> };
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists