[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5d45c3f-065d-c8e7-fcc6-4cdb54bfdd70@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:44:57 -0400
From: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] Bonding: add per-port priority for failover
re-selection
On 6/14/22 23:29, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Add per port priority support for bonding active slave re-selection during
> failover. A higher number means higher priority in selection. The primary
> slave still has the highest priority. This option also follows the
> primary_reselect rules.
>
> This option could only be configured via netlink.
>
> v2: using the extant bonding options management stuff instead setting
> slave prio in bond_slave_changelink() directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/bonding.rst | 11 +++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 27 +++++++++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c | 19 ++++++++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/bond_options.h | 1 +
> include/net/bonding.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> 8 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/bonding.rst b/Documentation/networking/bonding.rst
> index 43be3782e5df..53a18ff7cf23 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/bonding.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/bonding.rst
> @@ -780,6 +780,17 @@ peer_notif_delay
> value is 0 which means to match the value of the link monitor
> interval.
>
> +prio
> + Slave priority. A higher number means higher priority.
> + The primary slave has the highest priority. This option also
> + follows the primary_reselect rules.
> +
> + This option could only be configured via netlink, and is only valid
> + for active-backup(1), balance-tlb (5) and balance-alb (6) mode.
> + The valid value range is a signed 32 bit integer.
> +
> + The default value is 0.
Why is this a signed 32 bit number? Why not a u8, it would seem 256
[255,0] options is more than enough to select from. Is there a specific
reason it needs to be an s32?
If the reason for selecting a signed value is so that the default
priority could be in the middle of the range, why not just set the
default to be 128, assuming u8 is wide enough?
> +
> primary
>
> A string (eth0, eth2, etc) specifying which slave is the
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 3d427183ec8e..3415a0feea07 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1026,12 +1026,38 @@ static void bond_do_fail_over_mac(struct bonding *bond,
>
> }
>
> +/**
> + * bond_choose_primary_or_current - select the primary or high priority slave
> + * @bond: our bonding struct
> + *
> + * - Check if there is a primary link. If the primary link was set and is up,
> + * go on and do link reselection.
> + *
> + * - If primary link is not set or down, find the highest priority link.
> + * If the highest priority link is not current slave, set it as primary
> + * link and do link reselection.
> + */
> static struct slave *bond_choose_primary_or_current(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct slave *prim = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
> struct slave *curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> + struct slave *slave, *hprio = NULL;
> + struct list_head *iter;
>
> if (!prim || prim->link != BOND_LINK_UP) {
> + bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> + if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP) {
> + hprio = hprio ?: slave;
> + if (slave->prio > hprio->prio)
> + hprio = slave;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (hprio && hprio != curr) {
> + prim = hprio;
> + goto link_reselect;
> + }
> +
> if (!curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
> return NULL;
> return curr;
> @@ -1042,6 +1068,7 @@ static struct slave *bond_choose_primary_or_current(struct bonding *bond)
> return prim;
> }
>
> +link_reselect:
> if (!curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
> return prim;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> index 5a6f44455b95..41b3244747fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static size_t bond_get_slave_size(const struct net_device *bond_dev,
> nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) + /* IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_AGGREGATOR_ID */
> nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)) + /* IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_ACTOR_OPER_PORT_STATE */
> nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) + /* IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_PARTNER_OPER_PORT_STATE */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(s32)) + /* IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO */
> 0;
> }
>
> @@ -53,6 +54,9 @@ static int bond_fill_slave_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_QUEUE_ID, slave->queue_id))
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
> + if (nla_put_s32(skb, IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO, slave->prio))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> if (BOND_MODE(slave->bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> const struct aggregator *agg;
> const struct port *ad_port;
> @@ -117,6 +121,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy bond_policy[IFLA_BOND_MAX + 1] = {
>
> static const struct nla_policy bond_slave_policy[IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_MAX + 1] = {
> [IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_QUEUE_ID] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
> + [IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO] = { .type = NLA_S32 },
> };
>
> static int bond_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[],
> @@ -157,6 +162,20 @@ static int bond_slave_changelink(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> return err;
> }
>
> + if (data[IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO]) { > + int prio = nla_get_s32(data[IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO]);
> + char prio_str[IFNAMSIZ + 7];
> +
> + /* prio option setting expects slave_name:prio */
> + snprintf(prio_str, sizeof(prio_str), "%s:%d\n",
> + slave_dev->name, prio);
> +
> + bond_opt_initstr(&newval, prio_str);
It might be less code and a little cleaner to extend struct
bond_opt_value with a slave pointer.
struct bond_opt_value {
char *string;
u64 value;
u32 flags;
union {
char cextra[BOND_OPT_EXTRA_MAXLEN];
struct net_device *slave_dev;
} extra;
};
Then modify __bond_opt_init to set the slave pointer, basically a set of
bond_opt_slave_init{} macros. This would remove the need to parse the
slave interface name in the set function. Setting .flags =
BOND_OPTFLAG_RAWVAL (already done I see) in the option definition to
avoid bond_opt_parse() from loosing our extra information by pointing to
a .values table entry. Now in the option specific set function we can
just find the slave entry and set the value, no more string parsing code
needed.
> + err = __bond_opt_set(bond, BOND_OPT_PRIO, &newval);
I think this patch series needs to be rebased onto latest
net-next/master as a patch series I sent added two extra parameter list
arguments to __bond_opt_set().
2bff369b2354 bonding: netlink error message support for options
Considering my comments above about extending bond_opt_value, I might
look as sending a fixup patch to remove all the parameter list additions
and hide the netlink extack pointer in bond_opt_value.
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> index 96eef19cffc4..bac3858825b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ static int bond_option_arp_validate_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> static int bond_option_arp_all_targets_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> +static int bond_option_prio_set(struct bonding *bond,
> + const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> static int bond_option_primary_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> static int bond_option_primary_reselect_set(struct bonding *bond,
> @@ -365,6 +367,16 @@ static const struct bond_option bond_opts[BOND_OPT_LAST] = {
> .values = bond_intmax_tbl,
> .set = bond_option_miimon_set
> },
> + [BOND_OPT_PRIO] = {
> + .id = BOND_OPT_PRIO,
> + .name = "prio",
> + .desc = "Link priority for failover re-selection",
> + .flags = BOND_OPTFLAG_RAWVAL,
> + .unsuppmodes = BOND_MODE_ALL_EX(BIT(BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) |
> + BIT(BOND_MODE_TLB) |
> + BIT(BOND_MODE_ALB)),
> + .set = bond_option_prio_set
> + },
> [BOND_OPT_PRIMARY] = {
> .id = BOND_OPT_PRIMARY,
> .name = "primary",
> @@ -1306,6 +1318,61 @@ static int bond_option_missed_max_set(struct bonding *bond,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int bond_option_prio_set(struct bonding *bond,
> + const struct bond_opt_value *newval)
> +{
> + struct slave *slave, *update_slave;
> + struct net_device *sdev;
> + struct list_head *iter;
> + char *delim;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int prio;
Priorities are only considered if there is no primary set, correct?
Would you not want to issue a netdev_warn here noting the fact that this
will be ignored if the bond device has a primary set? Much like how
other options issue warnings, or in miimon's case turn off arp monitor,
when other configuration influence the effectiveness of the setting?
> +
> + /* delim will point to prio if successful */
> + delim = strchr(newval->string, ':');
> + if (!delim)
> + goto err_no_cmd;
> +
> + /* Terminate string that points to device name and bump it
> + * up one, so we can read the prio there.
> + */
> + *delim = '\0';
> + if (sscanf(++delim, "%d\n", &prio) != 1)
> + goto err_no_cmd;
> +
> + /* Valid ifname */
> + if (!dev_valid_name(newval->string))
> + goto err_no_cmd;
> +
> + /* Get the pointer to that interface if it exists */
> + sdev = __dev_get_by_name(dev_net(bond->dev), newval->string);
> + if (!sdev)
> + goto err_no_cmd;
> +
> + update_slave = NULL;
> + bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> + if (sdev == slave->dev)
> + update_slave = slave;
> + }
> +
> + if (!update_slave)
> + goto err_no_cmd;
> +
> + /* Actually set the prio for the slave */
> + update_slave->prio = prio;
> +
> + /* Do reselect after prio update */
> + bond_select_active_slave(bond);
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +
> +err_no_cmd:
> + netdev_dbg(bond->dev, "invalid input for slave prio set\n");
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + goto out;
> +}
> +
> static int bond_option_primary_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval)
> {
> diff --git a/include/net/bond_options.h b/include/net/bond_options.h
> index 1618b76f4903..569808933094 100644
> --- a/include/net/bond_options.h
> +++ b/include/net/bond_options.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ enum {
> BOND_OPT_LACP_ACTIVE,
> BOND_OPT_MISSED_MAX,
> BOND_OPT_NS_TARGETS,
> + BOND_OPT_PRIO,
> BOND_OPT_LAST
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
> index cb904d356e31..6e78d657aa05 100644
> --- a/include/net/bonding.h
> +++ b/include/net/bonding.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct slave {
> u32 speed;
> u16 queue_id;
> u8 perm_hwaddr[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
> + int prio;
> struct ad_slave_info *ad_info;
> struct tlb_slave_info tlb_info;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index 5f58dcfe2787..e36d9d2c65a7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -963,6 +963,7 @@ enum {
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_AGGREGATOR_ID,
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_ACTOR_OPER_PORT_STATE,
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_PARTNER_OPER_PORT_STATE,
> + IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO,
> __IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_MAX,
> };
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index b339bf2196ca..0242f31e339c 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ enum {
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_AGGREGATOR_ID,
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_ACTOR_OPER_PORT_STATE,
> IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_AD_PARTNER_OPER_PORT_STATE,
> + IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO,
> __IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_MAX,
> };
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists