[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKBqjowbGsSuc2g8yP9MBANhsroB+dhJep93cnx_EmNow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:37:51 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
BPF Mailing List <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Curious bpf regression in 5.18 already fixed in stable 5.18.3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 9:57 AM Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > I've confirmed vanilla 5.18.0 is broken, and all it takes is
> > cherrypicking that specific stable 5.18.x patch [
> > 710a8989b4b4067903f5b61314eda491667b6ab3 ] to fix behaviour.
...
> b8bd3ee1971d1edbc53cf322c149ca0227472e56 this is where we added EFAULT in 5.16
There are no such sha-s in the upstream kernel.
Sorry we cannot help with debugging of android kernels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists