[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0978da15ac79d71c007c25d9b1bdc352b8ef3a9b.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:49:20 +0000
From: <Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>
To: <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next v2 06/15] net: dsa: microchip: get P_STP_CTRL
in ksz_port_stp_state by ksz_dev_ops
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 12:31 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 04:12:48PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> > At present, P_STP_CTRL register value is passed as parameter to
> > ksz_port_stp_state from the individual dsa_switch_ops hooks. This
> > patch
> > update the function to retrieve the register value through the
> > ksz_dev_ops function pointer.
> > And add the static to ksz_update_port_member since it is not called
> > outside the ksz_common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c | 9 +++++----
> > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 10 +++++-----
> > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 9 +++++----
> > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h | 5 ++---
> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> > b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> > index 8657b520b336..e6982fa9d382 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c
> > @@ -920,9 +920,9 @@ static void ksz8_cfg_port_member(struct
> > ksz_device *dev, int port, u8 member)
> > ksz_pwrite8(dev, port, P_MIRROR_CTRL, data);
> > }
> >
> > -static void ksz8_port_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int
> > port, u8 state)
> > +static int ksz8_get_stp_reg(void)
> > {
> > - ksz_port_stp_state_set(ds, port, state, P_STP_CTRL);
> > + return P_STP_CTRL;
> > }
>
> Since there's nothing dynamic about get_stp_reg(), can the STP
> register
> location stay in struct ksz_chip_data?
I will update the ksz_chip_data for holding the address of STP_CTL
register.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists