[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220616093422.2e9ec948@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:34:22 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan - ML <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 6lowpan netlink
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:00:08 -0400 Alexander Aring wrote:
> > > I want to spread around that I started to work on some overdue
> > > implementation, a netlink 6lowpan configuration interface, because
> > > rtnetlink is not enough... it's for configuring very specific 6lowpan
> > > device settings.
> >
> > Great, looking forward to it!
>
> I would like to trigger a discussion about rtnetlink or generic. I can
> put a nested rtnetlink for some device specific settings but then the
> whole iproute2 (as it's currently is) would maintain a specific
> 6lowpan setting which maybe the user never wants...
> I think we should follow this way when there is a strict ipv6 device
> specific setting e.g. l2 neighbor information in ipv6 ndisc.
Unless you'll have to repeat attributes which are already present
in rtnetlink in an obvious way genetlink > rtnetlink.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists