lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZdPi8cdgDUtDN=Oqz7Po+_XsKS=tRmx-Hg=_Mix9ftKQ5b3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 19:29:53 +0200
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To:     Moises Veleta <moises.veleta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        johannes@...solutions.net, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
        m.chetan.kumar@...el.com, chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com,
        linuxwwan@...el.com, chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com,
        haijun.liu@...iatek.com, ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, dinesh.sharma@...el.com,
        ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, moises.veleta@...el.com,
        Madhusmita Sahu <madhusmita.sahu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: wwan: t7xx: Add AP CLDMA and GNSS port

Hi Moises,

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:58, Moises Veleta
<moises.veleta@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> From: Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@...iatek.com>
>
> The t7xx device contains two Cross Layer DMA (CLDMA) interfaces to
> communicate with AP and Modem processors respectively. So far only
> MD-CLDMA was being used, this patch enables AP-CLDMA and the GNSS
> port which requires such channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Liu <haijun.liu@...iatek.com>
> Co-developed-by: Madhusmita Sahu <madhusmita.sahu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Madhusmita Sahu <madhusmita.sahu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Moises Veleta <moises.veleta@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
[...]
>
>  static const struct t7xx_port_conf t7xx_md_port_conf[] = {
>         {
> +               .tx_ch = PORT_CH_AP_GNSS_TX,
> +               .rx_ch = PORT_CH_AP_GNSS_RX,
> +               .txq_index = Q_IDX_CTRL,
> +               .rxq_index = Q_IDX_CTRL,
> +               .path_id = CLDMA_ID_AP,
> +               .ops = &wwan_sub_port_ops,
> +               .name = "t7xx_ap_gnss",
> +               .port_type = WWAN_PORT_AT,

Is it really AT protocol here? wouldn't it be possible to expose it
via the existing GNSS susbsystem?

Regards,
Looic

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ