lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220617082225.333c5223@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:22:25 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Ismael Luceno <iluceno@...e.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Netlink NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag lost

On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:55:53 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> > No, I'm concerned that while in the dumping loop, the table might
> > change between iterations, and if this results in the loop not finding
> > more entries, because in most these functions there's no
> > consistency check after the loop, this will go undetected.  
> 
> Specific example? e.g., fib dump and address dumps have a generation id
> that gets recorded before the start of the dump and checked at the end
> of the dump.

FWIW what I think is strange is that we record the gen id before the
dump and then check if the recorded version was old. Like.. what's the
point of that? Nothing updates cb->seq while dumping AFAICS, so the
code is functionally equivalent to this right?

diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index 92b778e423df..0cd7482dc1f0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -2259,6 +2259,7 @@ static int inet_netconf_dump_devconf(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		cb->seq = atomic_read(&net->ipv4.dev_addr_genid) ^
 			  net->dev_base_seq;
+		nl_dump_check_consistent(cb, nlmsg_hdr(skb));
 		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(dev, head, index_hlist) {
 			if (idx < s_idx)
 				goto cont;
@@ -2276,7 +2277,6 @@ static int inet_netconf_dump_devconf(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				rcu_read_unlock();
 				goto done;
 			}
-			nl_dump_check_consistent(cb, nlmsg_hdr(skb));
 cont:
 			idx++;
 		}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ