[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:12:16 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: HighW4y2H3ll <huzh@....edu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortify String build warnings caused by the memcpy
check in hinic_devlink.c.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 19:57:27 -0400
HighW4y2H3ll <huzh@....edu> wrote:
> ...
> memcpy(&host_image->image_section_info[i],
> &fw_image->fw_section_info[i],
> sizeof(struct fw_section_info_st));
> ...
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h
> index 46760d607b9b..d7b26830c9ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h
> @@ -92,14 +92,20 @@ struct fw_image_st {
> u32 fw_section_cnt:16;
> u32 resd:16;
> } fw_info;
> - struct fw_section_info_st fw_section_info[MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM];
> + union {
> + struct_group(info, fw_section_info_st fw_section_info[0];);
> + struct fw_section_info_st __data[MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM];
> + };
> u32 device_id;
> u32 res[101];
> void *bin_data;
> };
>
> struct host_image_st {
> - struct fw_section_info_st image_section_info[MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM];
> + union {
> + struct_group(info, fw_section_info_st image_section_info[0];);
> + struct fw_section_info_st __data[MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM];
> + };
> struct {
> u32 up_total_len;
> u32 fw_version;
Patch is missing signed-of-by
Using [0] inside union will cause warnings in future since you are referencing
outside of bounds of array.
Also indentation is wrong, you need to indent the union
Powered by blists - more mailing lists