[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqxTxEJoCadJ1OyF@zx2c4.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:13:24 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] tcp: fix possible freeze in tx path
under memory pressure
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:08:14PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:17:34AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > Blamed commit only dealt with applications issuing small writes.
> >
> > Issue here is that we allow to force memory schedule for the sk_buff
> > allocation, but we have no guarantee that sendmsg() is able to
> > copy some payload in it.
> >
> > In this patch, I make sure the socket can use up to tcp_wmem[0] bytes.
> >
> > For example, if we consider tcp_wmem[0] = 4096 (default on x86),
> > and initial skb->truesize being 1280, tcp_sendmsg() is able to
> > copy up to 2816 bytes under memory pressure.
> >
> > Before this patch a sendmsg() sending more than 2816 bytes
> > would either block forever (if persistent memory pressure),
> > or return -EAGAIN.
> >
> > For bigger MTU networks, it is advised to increase tcp_wmem[0]
> > to avoid sending too small packets.
> >
> > v2: deal with zero copy paths.
>
> I think this might have gotten double applied:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=849b425cd091e1804af964b771761cfbefbafb43
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=f54755f6a11accb2db5ef17f8f75aad0875aefdc
>
> and now net-next builds are broken:
>
> ../../../../../../../../net/ipv4/tcp.c:971:12: error: redefinition of ‘tcp_wmem_schedule’
> 971 | static int tcp_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int copy) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../../../../../../../net/ipv4/tcp.c:954:12: note: previous definition of ‘tcp_wmem_schedule’ with type ‘int(struct sock *, int)’
> 954 | static int tcp_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int copy) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../../../../../../../net/ipv4/tcp.c:954:12: warning: ‘tcp_wmem_schedule’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] make[5]: *** [/home/wgci/tmp/2813390.12234/tmp.0PMBO65tGf/scripts/Makefile.build:249: net
> /ipv4/tcp.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [/home/wgci/tmp/2813390.12234/tmp.0PMBO65tGf/scripts/Makefile.build:466: net/ipv4] Error 2
> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Ah, fixed already:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=fd8b330ce1bb79ba00047435cc213b14f886bf1f
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists