lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220620191353.1184629-2-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:13:53 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        jakub@...udflare.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, borisp@...dia.com, cong.wang@...edance.com,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] sock: redo the psock vs ULP protection check

Commit 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
has moved the inet_csk_has_ulp(sk) check from sk_psock_init() to
the new tcp_bpf_update_proto() function. I'm guessing that this
was done to allow creating psocks for non-inet sockets.

Unfortunately the destruction path for psock includes the ULP
unwind, so we need to fail the sk_psock_init() itself.
Otherwise if ULP is already present we'll notice that later,
and call tcp_update_ulp() with the sk_proto of the ULP
itself, which will most likely result in the ULP looping
its callbacks.

Fixes: 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: john.fastabend@...il.com
CC: jakub@...udflare.com
CC: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
CC: dsahern@...nel.org
CC: ast@...nel.org
CC: daniel@...earbox.net
CC: andrii@...nel.org
CC: kafai@...com
CC: songliubraving@...com
CC: yhs@...com
CC: kpsingh@...nel.org
CC: borisp@...dia.com
CC: cong.wang@...edance.com
CC: bpf@...r.kernel.org
---
 include/net/inet_sock.h | 5 +++++
 net/core/skmsg.c        | 5 +++++
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c      | 3 ---
 net/tls/tls_main.c      | 2 ++
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h
index c1b5dcd6597c..daead5fb389a 100644
--- a/include/net/inet_sock.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h
@@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ struct inet_sock {
 #define IP_CMSG_CHECKSUM	BIT(7)
 #define IP_CMSG_RECVFRAGSIZE	BIT(8)
 
+static inline bool sk_is_inet(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return sk->sk_family == AF_INET || sk->sk_family == AF_INET6;
+}
+
 /**
  * sk_to_full_sk - Access to a full socket
  * @sk: pointer to a socket
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 22b983ade0e7..b0fcd0200e84 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -699,6 +699,11 @@ struct sk_psock *sk_psock_init(struct sock *sk, int node)
 
 	write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 
+	if (sk_is_inet(sk) && inet_csk_has_ulp(sk)) {
+		psock = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	if (sk->sk_user_data) {
 		psock = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 		goto out;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index be3947e70fec..0d3f68bb51c0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -611,9 +611,6 @@ int tcp_bpf_update_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock, bool restore)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	if (inet_csk_has_ulp(sk))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
 		if (tcp_bpf_assert_proto_ops(psock->sk_proto))
 			return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
index da176411c1b5..2ffede463e4a 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -921,6 +921,8 @@ static void tls_update(struct sock *sk, struct proto *p,
 {
 	struct tls_context *ctx;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot == p);
+
 	ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
 	if (likely(ctx)) {
 		ctx->sk_write_space = write_space;
-- 
2.36.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ