| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220620093024.GB23685@pengutronix.de> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:30:24 +0200 From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> To: Ernesto Vigano' <lanciadelsole@...il.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: question on driver for phy dp83td510e Hi Ernesto, Cc-ing: netdev@...r.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:45:59AM +0200, Ernesto Vigano' wrote: > I see that some weeks ago a driver for phy dp83td510e from TI > (https://www.ti.com/product/DP83TD510E). > I see that it's really different from the Linux driver supplied by TI > on its official repo > https://git.ti.com/gitweb?p=ti-analog-linux-kernel/dmurphy-analog.git;a=commit;h=fefa908e4e3262455a0cec08f3bb7161d7792d02 > As an example, TI writes some undocumented register for version 1.0 of the PHY. I do not have version 1.0 PHY. May be it is presilicon FPGA version of the devices. > Should I forget about the TI driver? Yes. If you have some issue, please report them of send patches, against mainline driver. > Or is there something that should be integrated in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c > ? If it is fixing something, then yes. Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists