[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <165590732434.75778.15270277193176343053.stgit@manet.1015granger.net>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:15:24 -0400
From:   Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     david@...morbit.com, tgraf@...g.ch, jlayton@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC 24/30] NFSD: Remove stale comment from nfsd_file_acquire()
I tried the change suggested by the comment, and things broke. IMO
that demonstrates the necessity of leaving the fh_verify() call in
place.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/filecache.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
index 23c51b95d2a2..ae813e6f645f 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
@@ -992,7 +992,6 @@ nfsd_do_file_acquire(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
 	unsigned int hashval;
 	bool retry = true;
 
-	/* FIXME: skip this if fh_dentry is already set? */
 	status = fh_verify(rqstp, fhp, S_IFREG,
 				may_flags|NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE);
 	if (status != nfs_ok)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
