netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: helper function for skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220622083719.13af304a@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:37:19 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
        steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        willemb@...gle.com, imagedong@...cent.com, talalahmad@...gle.com,
        kafai@...com, vasily.averin@...ux.dev, luiz.von.dentz@...el.com,
        jk@...econstruct.com.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: helper function for skb_shift

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:25:20 +0200 Richard Gobert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 10:12:40PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > and consider changing the subject from talking about skb_shift() 
> > which is just one of the users now to mentioning the helper's name.  
> 
> When submitting the updated patch with a new subject, should it be marked v3
> or is it considered a new patch entirely?

v3 is better, that way maintainers will know to look for a previous
version to check if feedback has been addressed.