[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220622051255.700309-6-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 05:12:41 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/19] ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock in __pim_rcv()
rcu_read_lock() protection is more than enough.
vif_dev_read() supports either mrt_lock or rcu_read_lock().
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index 8fe7a688cf41deeb99c7ca554f1788a956d2fdb9..8a94f9a459cd077d74b5e38c3d2f248620d4ecfc 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ static int __pim_rcv(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
{
struct net_device *reg_dev = NULL;
struct iphdr *encap;
+ int vif_num;
encap = (struct iphdr *)(skb_transport_header(skb) + pimlen);
/* Check that:
@@ -594,11 +595,10 @@ static int __pim_rcv(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
ntohs(encap->tot_len) + pimlen > skb->len)
return 1;
- read_lock(&mrt_lock);
- if (mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num >= 0)
- reg_dev = vif_dev_read(&mrt->vif_table[mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num]);
- read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
-
+ /* Pairs with WRITE_ONCE() in vif_add()/vid_delete() */
+ vif_num = READ_ONCE(mrt->mroute_reg_vif_num);
+ if (vif_num >= 0)
+ reg_dev = vif_dev_read(&mrt->vif_table[vif_num]);
if (!reg_dev)
return 1;
--
2.37.0.rc0.104.g0611611a94-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists