[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220624201537.l7p6aoquvvadmpei@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 22:15:37 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: ethernet: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Disable delayline
if it is invalid
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 07:37:08PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > The Rockchip hardware supports enabling/disabling delays and
> > configuring a delay value of 0x00-0x7f. For the RK3588 evaluation
> > board the RX delay should be disabled.
>
> So you can just put 0 in DT then.
My understanding is, that there is a difference between
enabled delay with a delay value of 0 and delay fully
disabled. But I could not find any details aboout this
in the datasheet unfortunately.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists