[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220627185857.1272-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:58:57 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] af_unix: Do not call kmemdup() for init_net's sysctl table.
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:40:24 +0200
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 8:30 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:58:59 -0700
> > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2022 11:43:27 -0500 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > > Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > While setting up init_net's sysctl table, we need not duplicate the global
> > > > > table and can use it directly.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> > > >
> > > > I am not quite certain the savings of a single entry table justivies
> > > > the complexity. But the looks correct.
> > >
> > > Yeah, the commit message is a little sparse. The "why" is not addressed.
> > > Could you add more details to explain the motivation?
> >
> > I was working on a series which converts UDP/TCP hash tables into per-netns
> > ones like AF_UNIX to speed up looking up sockets. It will consume much
> > memory on a host with thousands of netns, but it can be waste if we do not
> > have its protocol family's sockets.
>
> For the record, I doubt we will accept such a patch (per net-ns
> TCP/UDP hash tables)
Is it because it's risky?
IIRC, you said we need per netns table for TCP in the future.
> > So, I'm now working on a follow-up series for AF_UNIX per-netns hash table
> > so that we can change the size for a child netns by a sysctl knob:
> >
> > # sysctl -w net.unix.child_hash_entries=128
> > # ip net add test # created with the hash table size 128
> > # ip net exec test sh
> > # sysctl net.unix.hash_entries # read-only
> > 128
> >
> > (The size for init_net can be changed via a new boot parameter
> > xhash_entries like uhash_entries/thash_entries.)
> >
> > While implementing that, I found that kmemdup() is called for init_net but
> > TCP/UDP does not (See: ipv4_sysctl_init_net()). Unlike IPv4, AF_UNIX does
> > not have a huge sysctl table, so it cannot be a problem though, this patch
> > is for consuming less memory and kind of consistency. The reason I submit
> > this seperately is that it might be better to have a Fixes tag.
>
> I think that af_unix module can be unloaded.
>
> Your patch will break the module unload operation.
Thank you!
I had to take of kfree() in unix_sysctl_unregister().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists