[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220628010243.166605-4-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:02:37 -0700
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fw@...len.de, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/9] mptcp: invoke MP_FAIL response when needed
From: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
mptcp_mp_fail_no_response shouldn't be invoked on each worker run, it
should be invoked only when MP_FAIL response timeout occurs.
This patch refactors the MP_FAIL response logic.
It leverages the fact that only the MPC/first subflow can gracefully
fail to avoid unneeded subflows traversal: the failing subflow can
be only msk->first.
A new 'fail_tout' field is added to the subflow context to record the
MP_FAIL response timeout and use such field to reliably share the
timeout timer between the MP_FAIL event and the MPTCP socket close
timeout.
Finally, a new ack is generated to send out MP_FAIL notification as soon
as we hit the relevant condition, instead of waiting a possibly unbound
time for the next data packet.
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/281
Fixes: d9fb797046c5 ("mptcp: Do not traverse the subflow connection list without lock")
Co-developed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 9 +++---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 3 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++------
4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index 91a62b598de4..45e2a48397b9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -299,22 +299,21 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_fail_received(struct sock *sk, u64 fail_seq)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
- struct sock *s = (struct sock *)msk;
pr_debug("fail_seq=%llu", fail_seq);
if (!READ_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback))
return;
- if (!READ_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect)) {
+ if (!subflow->fail_tout) {
pr_debug("send MP_FAIL response and infinite map");
subflow->send_mp_fail = 1;
subflow->send_infinite_map = 1;
- } else if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ tcp_send_ack(sk);
+ } else {
pr_debug("MP_FAIL response received");
-
- sk_stop_timer(s, &s->sk_timer);
+ WRITE_ONCE(subflow->fail_tout, 0);
}
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 17e13396024a..e6fcb61443dd 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void mptcp_set_timeout(struct sock *sk)
__mptcp_set_timeout(sk, tout);
}
-static bool tcp_can_send_ack(const struct sock *ssk)
+static inline bool tcp_can_send_ack(const struct sock *ssk)
{
return !((1 << inet_sk_state_load(ssk)) &
(TCPF_SYN_SENT | TCPF_SYN_RECV | TCPF_TIME_WAIT | TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN));
@@ -2175,21 +2175,6 @@ static void mptcp_retransmit_timer(struct timer_list *t)
sock_put(sk);
}
-static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
-mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
-{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *ret = NULL;
-
- mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
- if (READ_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect)) {
- ret = subflow;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static void mptcp_timeout_timer(struct timer_list *t)
{
struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer);
@@ -2518,27 +2503,50 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
}
+/* schedule the timeout timer for the relevant event: either close timeout
+ * or mp_fail timeout. The close timeout takes precedence on the mp_fail one
+ */
+void mptcp_reset_timeout(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned long fail_tout)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+ unsigned long timeout, close_timeout;
+
+ if (!fail_tout && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+ return;
+
+ close_timeout = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp - tcp_jiffies32 + jiffies + TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN;
+
+ /* the close timeout takes precedence on the fail one, and here at least one of
+ * them is active
+ */
+ timeout = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) ? close_timeout : fail_tout;
+
+ sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, timeout);
+}
+
static void mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
{
- struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
- struct sock *ssk;
+ struct sock *ssk = msk->first;
bool slow;
- subflow = mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(msk);
- if (subflow) {
- pr_debug("MP_FAIL doesn't respond, reset the subflow");
+ if (!ssk)
+ return;
- ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
- slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
- mptcp_subflow_reset(ssk);
- unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
- }
+ pr_debug("MP_FAIL doesn't respond, reset the subflow");
+
+ slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+ mptcp_subflow_reset(ssk);
+ WRITE_ONCE(mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk)->fail_tout, 0);
+ unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
+
+ mptcp_reset_timeout(msk, 0);
}
static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = container_of(work, struct mptcp_sock, work);
struct sock *sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk;
+ unsigned long fail_tout;
int state;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -2575,7 +2583,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags))
__mptcp_retrans(sk);
- mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
+ fail_tout = msk->first ? READ_ONCE(mptcp_subflow_ctx(msk->first)->fail_tout) : 0;
+ if (fail_tout && time_after(jiffies, fail_tout))
+ mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
unlock:
release_sock(sk);
@@ -2822,6 +2832,7 @@ static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
bool do_cancel_work = false;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -2840,10 +2851,16 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
cleanup:
/* orphan all the subflows */
inet_csk(sk)->icsk_mtup.probe_timestamp = tcp_jiffies32;
- mptcp_for_each_subflow(mptcp_sk(sk), subflow) {
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
bool slow = lock_sock_fast_nested(ssk);
+ /* since the close timeout takes precedence on the fail one,
+ * cancel the latter
+ */
+ if (ssk == msk->first)
+ subflow->fail_tout = 0;
+
sock_orphan(ssk);
unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
}
@@ -2852,13 +2869,13 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
sock_hold(sk);
pr_debug("msk=%p state=%d", sk, sk->sk_state);
if (mptcp_sk(sk)->token)
- mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_CLOSED, mptcp_sk(sk), NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_CLOSED, msk, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE) {
__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
do_cancel_work = true;
} else {
- sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
+ mptcp_reset_timeout(msk, 0);
}
release_sock(sk);
if (do_cancel_work)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 200f89f6d62f..1d2d71711872 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -468,7 +468,6 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
local_id_valid : 1, /* local_id is correctly initialized */
valid_csum_seen : 1; /* at least one csum validated */
enum mptcp_data_avail data_avail;
- bool mp_fail_response_expect;
u32 remote_nonce;
u64 thmac;
u32 local_nonce;
@@ -482,6 +481,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
u8 stale_count;
long delegated_status;
+ unsigned long fail_tout;
);
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ void mptcp_get_options(const struct sk_buff *skb,
void mptcp_finish_connect(struct sock *sk);
void __mptcp_set_connected(struct sock *sk);
+void mptcp_reset_timeout(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned long fail_tout);
static inline bool mptcp_is_fully_established(struct sock *sk)
{
return inet_sk_state_load(sk) == TCP_ESTABLISHED &&
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 42a7c18a1c24..8dfea6a8a82f 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -971,7 +971,6 @@ static enum mapping_status get_mapping_status(struct sock *ssk,
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
bool csum_reqd = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled);
- struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
struct mptcp_ext *mpext;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u16 data_len;
@@ -1013,9 +1012,6 @@ static enum mapping_status get_mapping_status(struct sock *ssk,
pr_debug("infinite mapping received");
MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_INFINITEMAPRX);
subflow->map_data_len = 0;
- if (!sock_flag(ssk, SOCK_DEAD))
- sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
-
return MAPPING_INVALID;
}
@@ -1162,6 +1158,33 @@ static bool subflow_can_fallback(struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
return !subflow->fully_established;
}
+static void mptcp_subflow_fail(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
+ unsigned long fail_tout;
+
+ /* greceful failure can happen only on the MPC subflow */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ssk != READ_ONCE(msk->first)))
+ return;
+
+ /* since the close timeout take precedence on the fail one,
+ * no need to start the latter when the first is already set
+ */
+ if (sock_flag((struct sock *)msk, SOCK_DEAD))
+ return;
+
+ /* we don't need extreme accuracy here, use a zero fail_tout as special
+ * value meaning no fail timeout at all;
+ */
+ fail_tout = jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX;
+ if (!fail_tout)
+ fail_tout = 1;
+ WRITE_ONCE(subflow->fail_tout, fail_tout);
+ tcp_send_ack(ssk);
+
+ mptcp_reset_timeout(msk, subflow->fail_tout);
+}
+
static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
@@ -1236,11 +1259,8 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
tcp_send_active_reset(ssk, GFP_ATOMIC);
while ((skb = skb_peek(&ssk->sk_receive_queue)))
sk_eat_skb(ssk, skb);
- } else if (!sock_flag(ssk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
- WRITE_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect, true);
- sk_reset_timer((struct sock *)msk,
- &((struct sock *)msk)->sk_timer,
- jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX);
+ } else {
+ mptcp_subflow_fail(msk, ssk);
}
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_avail, MPTCP_SUBFLOW_NODATA);
return true;
--
2.37.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists