[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220628022241.595835-13-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 22:22:20 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Xu Jia <xujia39@...wei.com>, Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, ajk@...nets.uni-bremen.de,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/34] hamradio: 6pack: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in decode_std_command()
From: Xu Jia <xujia39@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 2b04495e21cdb9b45c28c6aeb2da560184de20a3 ]
Hulk Robot reports incorrect sp->rx_count_cooked value in decode_std_command().
This should be caused by the subtracting from sp->rx_count_cooked before.
It seems that sp->rx_count_cooked value is changed to 0, which bypassed the
previous judgment.
The situation is shown below:
(Thread 1) | (Thread 2)
decode_std_command() | resync_tnc()
... |
if (rest == 2) |
sp->rx_count_cooked -= 2; |
else if (rest == 3) | ...
| sp->rx_count_cooked = 0;
sp->rx_count_cooked -= 1; |
for (i = 0; i < sp->rx_count_cooked; i++) // report error
checksum += sp->cooked_buf[i];
sp->rx_count_cooked is a shared variable but is not protected by a lock.
The same applies to sp->rx_count. This patch adds a lock to fix the bug.
The fail log is shown below:
=======================================================================
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c:925:31
index 400 is out of range for type 'unsigned char [400]'
CPU: 3 PID: 7433 Comm: kworker/u10:1 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc5-00163-g4b97bac0756a #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134
ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x50
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x62/0x6c
sixpack_receive_buf+0xfda/0x1330
tty_ldisc_receive_buf+0x13e/0x180
tty_port_default_receive_buf+0x6d/0xa0
flush_to_ldisc+0x213/0x3f0
process_one_work+0x98f/0x1620
worker_thread+0x665/0x1080
kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
...
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xu Jia <xujia39@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c
index 83dc1c2c3b84..d92df9bafbbd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/6pack.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct sixpack {
unsigned int rx_count;
unsigned int rx_count_cooked;
+ spinlock_t rxlock;
int mtu; /* Our mtu (to spot changes!) */
int buffsize; /* Max buffers sizes */
@@ -570,6 +571,7 @@ static int sixpack_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
sp->dev = dev;
spin_lock_init(&sp->lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&sp->rxlock);
refcount_set(&sp->refcnt, 1);
init_completion(&sp->dead);
@@ -925,6 +927,7 @@ static void decode_std_command(struct sixpack *sp, unsigned char cmd)
sp->led_state = 0x60;
/* fill trailing bytes with zeroes */
sp->tty->ops->write(sp->tty, &sp->led_state, 1);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
rest = sp->rx_count;
if (rest != 0)
for (i = rest; i <= 3; i++)
@@ -942,6 +945,7 @@ static void decode_std_command(struct sixpack *sp, unsigned char cmd)
sp_bump(sp, 0);
}
sp->rx_count_cooked = 0;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
}
break;
case SIXP_TX_URUN: printk(KERN_DEBUG "6pack: TX underrun\n");
@@ -971,8 +975,11 @@ sixpack_decode(struct sixpack *sp, const unsigned char *pre_rbuff, int count)
decode_prio_command(sp, inbyte);
else if ((inbyte & SIXP_STD_CMD_MASK) != 0)
decode_std_command(sp, inbyte);
- else if ((sp->status & SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) == SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK)
+ else if ((sp->status & SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) == SIXP_RX_DCD_MASK) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
decode_data(sp, inbyte);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sp->rxlock);
+ }
}
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists