[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220628194812.1453059-8-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:47:27 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xdp-hints@...-project.net
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 07/52] net, xdp: remove redundant arguments from dev_xdp_{at,de}tach_link()
dev_xdp_attach_link(): the sole caller always passes %NULL as
@extack and @link->dev as @dev, so they both can be omitted.
The very same story with dev_xdp_detach_link(): remove both
@dev and @extack as they both can be obtained inside the
function itself.
This decreases stack usage with no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
---
net/bpf/dev.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/dev.c b/net/bpf/dev.c
index 68a7b2c49392..0010b20719e8 100644
--- a/net/bpf/dev.c
+++ b/net/bpf/dev.c
@@ -534,17 +534,14 @@ static int dev_xdp_attach(struct net_device *dev, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack
return 0;
}
-static int dev_xdp_attach_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct bpf_xdp_link *link)
+static int dev_xdp_attach_link(struct bpf_xdp_link *link)
{
- return dev_xdp_attach(dev, extack, link, NULL, NULL, link->flags);
+ return dev_xdp_attach(link->dev, NULL, link, NULL, NULL, link->flags);
}
-static int dev_xdp_detach_link(struct net_device *dev,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct bpf_xdp_link *link)
+static int dev_xdp_detach_link(struct bpf_xdp_link *link)
{
+ struct net_device *dev = link->dev;
enum bpf_xdp_mode mode;
bpf_op_t bpf_op;
@@ -570,7 +567,7 @@ static void bpf_xdp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
* already NULL, in which case link was already auto-detached
*/
if (xdp_link->dev) {
- WARN_ON(dev_xdp_detach_link(xdp_link->dev, NULL, xdp_link));
+ WARN_ON(dev_xdp_detach_link(xdp_link));
xdp_link->dev = NULL;
}
@@ -709,7 +706,7 @@ int bpf_xdp_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
goto unlock;
}
- err = dev_xdp_attach_link(dev, NULL, link);
+ err = dev_xdp_attach_link(link);
rtnl_unlock();
if (err) {
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists