netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v3 05/29] net: bvec specific path in zerocopy_sg_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrtfMr+waxp37ru9@ZenIV>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 21:06:10 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 05/29] net: bvec specific path in
 zerocopy_sg_from_iter

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:56:27PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Add an bvec specialised and optimised path in zerocopy_sg_from_iter.
> It'll be used later for {get,put}_page() optimisations.

If you need a variant that would not grab page references for ITER_BVEC
(and presumably other non-userland ones), the natural thing to do would
be to provide just such a primitive, wouldn't it?

The fun question here is by which paths ITER_BVEC can be passed to that
function and which all of them are currently guaranteed to hold the
underlying pages pinned...

And AFAICS you quietly assume that only ITER_BVEC ones will ever have that
"managed" flag of your set.  Or am I misreading the next patch in the
series?