| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACGkMEutEYHf8kO_6gpk5BrMAndJPd8wDAPG2_Z9pxSiXXNDCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 16:36:12 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix the race between refill work and close
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 3:29 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 05:03:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> > enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the the
> > source the scheduling
>
> can't parse this sentence
I actually meant "we don't disable the source of the refill work scheduling".
>
> > of the refill work. This means an NAPI
>
> what do you mean "an NAPI"? a NAPI poll callback?
Yes.
>
> > after
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync() can schedule the refill work then can
> > re-enable the NAPI that leads to use-after-free [1].
> >
> > Since the work can enable NAPI, we can't simply disable NAPI before
> > calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(). So fix this by introducing a
> > dedicated boolean to control whether or not the work could be
> > scheduled from NAPI.
> >
> > [1]
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > Read of size 2 at addr ffff88810562c92e by task kworker/2:1/42
> >
> > CPU: 2 PID: 42 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc1+ #480
> > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> > Workqueue: events refill_work
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
> > print_report.cold+0xbb/0x6ac
> > ? _printk+0xad/0xde
> > ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > kasan_report+0xa8/0x130
> > ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > process_one_work+0x43d/0x780
> > worker_thread+0x2a0/0x6f0
> > ? process_one_work+0x780/0x780
> > kthread+0x167/0x1a0
> > ? kthread_exit+0x50/0x50
> > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > </TASK>
> > ...
> >
> > Fixes: b2baed69e605c ("virtio_net: set/cancel work on ndo_open/ndo_stop")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index db05b5e930be..21bf1e5c81ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
> > bool affinity_hint_set;
> >
> > + /* Is refill work enabled? */
> > + bool refill_work_enabled;
> > +
> > + /* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_work_enabled */
> > + spinlock_t refill_lock;
> > +
> > /* CPU hotplug instances for online & dead */
> > struct hlist_node node;
> > struct hlist_node node_dead;
> > @@ -348,6 +354,20 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > return p;
> > }
> >
> > +static void enable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > + vi->refill_work_enabled = true;
> > + spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void disable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > + vi->refill_work_enabled = false;
> > + spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
> > struct virtqueue *vq)
> > {
> > @@ -1527,8 +1547,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> > }
> >
> > if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
> > - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> > + spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > + if (vi->refill_work_enabled)
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > + spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->stats.syncp);
> > @@ -1651,6 +1675,8 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > int i, err;
> >
> > + enable_refill_work(vi);
> > +
> > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> > /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> > @@ -2033,6 +2059,8 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > int i;
> >
> > + /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> > + disable_refill_work(vi);
> > /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> >
> > @@ -2776,6 +2804,9 @@ static void virtnet_freeze_down(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > netif_tx_lock_bh(vi->dev);
> > netif_device_detach(vi->dev);
> > netif_tx_unlock_bh(vi->dev);
> > + /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> > + disable_refill_work(vi);
> > + /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> >
> > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> > @@ -2799,6 +2830,8 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >
> > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> >
> > + enable_refill_work(vi);
> > +
> > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> > for (i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; i++)
> > if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> > @@ -3548,6 +3581,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > vdev->priv = vi;
> >
> > INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
> > + spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
> >
> > /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
>
>
> Can't say I love all the extra state but oh well.
I couldn't find a better way. The tricky part is that NAPI and refill
can schedule each other so we need a third state.
Thanks
>
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists